Easytech Anatomical Shoulder SystemRecalls & reported problems across all models
Fx Solutions · 4 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 24
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 24
- Recalls
- 0
We found 4 models of Easytech Anatomical Shoulder System by Fx Solutions in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 24 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Aug 5, 2021 and Sep 14, 2026 — classified as 24 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (7 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported Easytech Anatomical Shoulder System problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available12
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated7
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
- Output Problem1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information8
- Joint Laxity5
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available3
- Failure of Implant2
- Medical device site infection2
- Implant Pain1
- Joint Dislocation1
- Subluxation1
Easytech Anatomical Shoulder System models
4 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Easytech Anatomical Shoulder System 314-0038Prosthesis, Total Anatomic Shoulder, Uncemented Metaphyseal Humeral Stem With No Diaphyseal Incursion, Semi-Constrained14 reports
- Easytech Anatomical Shoulder System 314-0034Prosthesis, Total Anatomic Shoulder, Uncemented Metaphyseal Humeral Stem With No Diaphyseal Incursion, Semi-Constrained5 reports
- Easytech Anatomical Shoulder System 314-0030Prosthesis, Total Anatomic Shoulder, Uncemented Metaphyseal Humeral Stem With No Diaphyseal Incursion, Semi-Constrained4 reports
- Easytech Anatomical Shoulder System 314-0042Prosthesis, Total Anatomic Shoulder, Uncemented Metaphyseal Humeral Stem With No Diaphyseal Incursion, Semi-Constrained1 report
Recent Easytech Anatomical Shoulder System adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 14, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 50764164 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO LOOSENING ON (B)(6) 2026? IT IS EVIDENTLY AN ISSUE WITH THE INITIAL POSITIONING OF THE IMPLANTS THAT LIKELY CAUSED EXCESSIVE STRESS AND, ULTIMATELY, LOOSENING OF THE PROSTHETIC GLENOID COMPONENT. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2025. AN EASYTECH ANCHOR BASE, AN EXCENTRIC HEAD, A 2 PEGS GLENOID AND A DOUBLE TAPER WERE EXPLANTED. A CUP, A GLENOSPHERE, A GLENOID BASEPLATE, SCREWS, A POST EXTENSION AND A STEM WERE IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 25607016 ↗InjuryMay 20, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2026. ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 13 MAY 2026. THE REVISION OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY 147 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY WHICH OCCURRED ON 11-SEP-2025. NO FALL OR OTHER TRAUMA REPORTED. BASED ON COMPARING USAGE FORMS ONLY EASYTECH ANCHOR BASE TA6V Ø38 MM CEMENTLESS TI/HA, 3-4 PEGS GLENOID PE CEMENTED SIZE XS, DOUBLE TAPER TA6V +0MM 0°, AND CENTERED HEAD COCR/TIN 46X17 WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO INSTABILITY. THESE PARTS WERE REPLACED WITH HUMELOCK REVERSED TA6V CEMENTLESS GLENOID BASEPLATE W/PEG TI/HA Ø24MM, +3MM LATERALIZED, HUMELOCK REVERSED CENTERED GLENOSPHERE W/ SCREW COCR/TA6V/TIN 10° TILT Ø36MM, TWO LOCKING SCREW TA6V Ø4.5MM L.35MM, LOCKING SCREW TA6V Ø4.5MM L.30MM AND HUMERAL CUP 135/145° STABILITY PE/TA6V Ø36 +3.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 25234680 ↗InjuryJun 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO A PAIN ON (B)(6) 2025. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2024. AN EASYTECH ANCHOR BASE , A DOUBLE TAPER AND AN OFFSET HEAD WERE EXPLANTED.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 22327041 ↗InjuryJun 19, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO AN INFECTION ON (B)(6) 2025. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2025.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 22291971 ↗InjuryFeb 8, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO A LOOSENING ON (B)(6) 2024. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2019. A 2 PEGS GLENOID, A HEAD, A DOUBLE TAPER AND AN EASYTECH ANCHOR BASE WERE EXPLANTED. A CUP, A GLENOSPHERE, A METAGLENE, SCREWS, SMARTLOOPS, AN OFFSET MODULAR SYSTEM AND A STEM WERE IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 18666042 ↗InjuryDec 15, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT WILL BE REVISED DUE TO A LOOSENING ON (B)(6) 2024. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2019. AN EASYTECH ANATOMIC MAY BE EXPLANTED. AN EASYTECH REVERSED COULD BE IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 18335420 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO LOOSENING ON (B)(6) 2023. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2023. AN ANCHOR BASE WAS EXPLANTED. A HUMERAL SPACER,A CUP, A SCREW AND A STEM WERE IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 16991363 ↗InjuryMar 2, 2023Unstable; Unstable
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO A LUXATION ON (B)(6) 2023. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6)2022. A CUP, A GLENOSPHERE, A METAGLENE AND AN ANCHOR BASE WERE EXPLANTED. A CUP, A GLENOSPHERE, A METAGLENE AND A STEM WERE IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Subluxation
MAUDE report 16468215 ↗InjuryApr 27, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2022 DUE TO DISMANTLING. APPROXIMATELY 35 DAYS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED 1 2 PEGS GLENOID, 1 CENTERED HEAD, 1 DOUBLE TAPER AND 1 ANCHOR BASE. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED 1 HUMERAL CUP Ø36+9, 1 GLENOID BASEPLATE, 1 CENTERED GLENOSPHERE WITH SCREW, 3 LOCKING SCREW AND 1 HUMELOCK STEM.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14216738 ↗InjuryMar 25, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2022 DUE TO STATE PATIENT. APPROXIMATELY 1 YEAR AND 7 MONTHS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED 1 CENTERED SPACER (46/5), 1 3-4 PEGS GLENOID (M), 1 CENTERED HEAD (46X17) AND 1 ANCHOR BASE (42). THE SURGEON IMPLANTED 1 GLENOID BASEPLATE (24), 1 CENTERED GLENOSPHERE (36), 1 STEM (36/12), 1 HUMERAL SPACER (9), 1 HUMERAL CUP (36/3), 2 LOCKING SCREWS (15), 2 STANDARD SCREWS (30) AND 1 CENTRAL SCREW (20).
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 13899702 ↗InjuryMar 3, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR POST-OP FRACTURE ON (B)(6) 20, 2022. APPROXIMATELY 8 MONTHS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED 1 ANCHOR BASE AND 1 HUMERAL CUP ECCENTRIC SYMMETRIC Ø36+3. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED 1 HUMELOCK REVERSED STEM Ø36/12 , 1 CAGE T40, 1 CORTICAL SCREW, 1 HUMERAL SPACER, 1 HUMERAL CUP Ø36+9 AND 1 HEX SCREW.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 13657965 ↗InjuryFeb 1, 2022Output Problem
PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO A DISMANTLING, APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED CENTERED HEAD, DOUBLE TAPER, ANCHOR BASE AND 2 PEGS GLENOID. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED POST EXTENSION, 135/145° Ø36+3 CUP, TWO STANDARD SCREW, LOCKING SCREW, CENTERED GLENOSPHERE AND GLENOID BASEPLATE.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 13410825 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO DISLOCATION, APPROXIMATELY 5 DAYS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED ANCHOR BASE AND SYMETRIC CUP Ø40+3. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED 135/145° Ø40+9 CUP AND HUMERIS STEM SIZE 14.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 13235959 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2022Material Split, Cut or Torn
PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO A CUFF TEAR. NO INFORMATION ON THE FIRST DATE OF SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED DOUBLE TAPER, ANCHOR BASE, 2 PEG GLENOID. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED EXCENTERED GLENOSPHERE, TWO CORTICAL SCREW, TWO LOCKING SCREW, TWO STANDARD SCREW, POST EXTENSION, STEM SIZE 12 AND Ø36+3 CUP.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 13234889 ↗
Other Fx Solutions products
- Humelock II Cemented Reversible Shoulder23 models · 406 reports
- TiN Coated Glenosphere5 models · 27 reports · 1 recall
- Humelock Cemented Shoulder Prosthesis7 models · 22 reports · 1 recall
- Humeral Cup Stability15 models · 65 reports
- Humeris Shoulder9 models · 35 reports
- Humelock Reversed Shoulder13 models · 32 reports
- Humelock II Cementless Shoulder System5 models · 26 reports
- Humelock II Cemented Shoulder System9 models · 20 reports
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page