Skip to content

Uric Acid ver.2 3183807190Recalls & reported problems

Roche Diagnostics GmbH · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04015630919154), received between Apr 20, 2023 and Sep 8, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Low Test Results” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Low Test Results2
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • High Test Results1
  • Incorrect Measurement1
  • Non Reproducible Results1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 8, 2026High Test Results

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50675833 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 18, 2024Incorrect Measurement; Incorrect Measurement

    THE INITIAL REPORTER STATED THEY RECEIVED DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR THREE PATIENT SAMPLES TESTED WITH URIC ACID VER.2 ON A COBAS 6000 C501 MODULE. THE FIRST SAMPLE INITIALLY RESULTED IN A URIC ACID VALUE OF 0.6 MG/DL. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON A SECOND ANALYZER, RESULTING IN A VALUE OF 7.69 MG/DL. THE SECOND SAMPLE INITIALLY RESULTED IN A URIC ACID VALUE OF 0.5 MG/DL. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON A SECOND ANALYZER, RESULTING IN A VALUE OF 5.41 MG/DL. THE THIRD SAMPLE INITIALLY RESULTED IN A URIC ACID VALUE OF 0.5 MG/DL. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON A SECOND ANALYZER, RESULTING IN A VALUE OF 5.03 MG/DL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19557771 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 25, 2023Low Test Results; Low Test Results

    THE INITIAL REPORTER STATED THEY RECEIVED DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR THREE PATIENT SAMPLES TESTED WITH UA2 (URIC ACID) ON A COBAS INTEGRA 400 PLUS SYSTEM. NO QUESTIONABLE RESULTS WERE REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. THE FIRST MEASUREMENT OF EACH SAMPLE WAS PERFORMED USING REAGENT LOT 693815. THE SECOND MEASUREMENT OF EACH SAMPLE WAS PERFORMED USING A SECOND PACK OF REAGENT LOT 693815. THE THIRD MEASUREMENT OF EACH SAMPLE WAS PERFORMED USING REAGENT LOT NUMBER 714189. SAMPLE 1 URIC ACID RESULTS: MEASUREMENT 1 = 0.76 MG/DL MEASUREMENT 2 = 0.71 MG/DL MEASUREMENT 3 = 6.05 MG/DL SAMPLE 2 URIC ACID RESULTS: MEASUREMENT 1 = 0.86 MG/DL MEASUREMENT 2 = 0.91 MG/DL MEASUREMENT 3 = 7.45 MG/DL SAMPLE 3 URIC ACID RESULTS: MEASUREMENT 1 = 0.46 MG/DL MEASUREMENT 2 = 0.43 MG/DL MEASUREMENT 3 = 3.93 MG/DL

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17390063 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2023Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Non Reproducible Results; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Non Reproducible Results

    THE INITIAL REPORTER STATED THEY RECEIVED DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR TWO PATIENT URINE SAMPLES TESTED WITH UA2 (URIC ACID VER.2) ON A COBAS 4000 C311. THE INITIAL RESULTS WERE REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY AND QUESTIONED BY THE PHYSICIAN AS THE PATIENTS HAD "NORMAL" SERUM VALUES. PATIENT SAMPLE 1: THE SAMPLE INITIALLY RESULTED IN A UA2 VALUE OF 3.29 MG/DL. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON A COBAS C 501 MODULE, RESULTING IN A VALUE OF 31.72 MG/DL. PATIENT SAMPLE 2: THE SAMPLE INITIALLY RESULTED IN A UA2 VALUE OF 3.0 MG/DL. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON A COBAS C 501 MODULE, RESULTING IN A VALUE OF 32 MG/DL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17309412 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 20, 2023Low Test Results; Low Test Results

    THERE WAS AN ALLEGATION OF QUESTIONABLE UA2 URIC ACID VER.2 RESULTS FOR 1 PATIENT FROM 5 SAMPLES ON TWO COBAS 8000 COBAS C 502 MODULES, SERIAL NUMBERS (B)(6). THE INITIAL RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. THE CUSTOMER COMMUNICATED WITH THE DOCTOR AND THEY STATED THAT THE RESULTS DO NOT MATCH THE PATIENT'S CLINICAL STATUS AND AN INTERFERING SUBSTANCE IS SUSPECTED. ON (B)(6)2023, THE UA2 RESULT FROM ANALYZER 17E4-01 WAS 0.0 MG/DL. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON ANALYZER 17E4-02 AND THE RESULT WAS 0.0 MG/DL. A SECOND SAMPLE COLLECTED FROM THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2023 ALSO RESULTED IN A UA VALUE OF 0.0 MG/DL ON ANALYZER 17E4-01. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE UA2 RESULTS FROM ANALYZER 17E4-01 WERE 0.1 MG/DL AND 0.1 MG/DL. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON ANALYZER 17E4-02 AND THE RESULT WAS 0.1 MG/DL. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE UA2 RESULT FROM ANALYZER 17E4-02 WAS 1.3 MG/DL. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE UA2 RESULT FROM ANALYZER 17E4-02 WAS 2.7 MG/DL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16781472 ↗

Other Acid, uric, uricase (colorimetric) devices

All Acid, uric, uricase (colorimetric) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page