Elecsys Syphilis 06923348190Recalls & reported problems
Roche Diagnostics GmbH · Class 2
All models of Elecsys Syphilis (5)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04015630934881), received between Apr 25, 2019 and Sep 16, 2025 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “False Negative Result” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- False Negative Result5
- False Positive Result1
- Low Test Results1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
- Insufficient Information1
- Localized Skin Lesion1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 16, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result
1. THERE WAS AN ALLEGATION OF FALSE-POSITIVE ELECSYS SYPHILIS RESULTS: 5 PATIENT- COBAS 6000 E601 MODULE. 2 PATIENT- COBAS 8000 - COBAS E 602 MODULE. 6 PATIENT- COBAS E 801 ANALYTICAL UNIT. 1 PATIENT- COBAS E 801 MODULE. 1 PATIENT- UNKNOWN ANALYZER 2. PATIENT AGE RANGE: 7 -55 YEARS. 3. PATIENT WEIGHT RANGE: ASKU. 4. PATIENT SEX BREAKDOWN: 3-FEMALE, 5-MALE, 8-ASKU. 5. PATIENT RACE BREAKDOWN: ASKU. 6. PATIENT ETHNICITY BREAKDOWN: ASKU.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23066029 ↗MalfunctionSep 16, 2025False Negative Result; False Negative Result
1. DESCRIBE THE EVENT: THE INITIAL REPORTER COMPLAINED OF DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR ELECSYS SYPHILIS: 1 PATIENT-COBAS 8000 E 602 MODULE AND A COBAS E 411 ANALYZER. 2 PATIENT -COBAS 8000 E 801 MODULE. 3 PATIENT-COBAS E 801 ANALYTICAL UNIT. 3 PATIENT-COBAS 8000 CORE UNIT. 2 PATIENT-COBAS 8000 - COBAS E 602 MODULE. 1 PATIENT-COBAS 6000 CORE UNIT. 2. PATIENT AGE RANGE: 18 MONTH-75 YEARS. 3. PATIENT WEIGHT RANGE: ASKU. 4. PATIENT SEX BREAKDOWN: 2-FEMALE. 4-MALE. 6-ASKU. 5. PATIENT RACE BREAKDOWN: 1-ASIAN. 11-ASKU. 6. PATIENT ETHNICITY BREAKDOWN: 1-NON-HISPANIC/LATINO. 11-ASKU.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Localized Skin Lesion; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23065297 ↗MalfunctionSep 26, 2024False Negative Result; False Negative Result
THERE WAS AN ALLEGATION OF QUESTIONABLE ELECSYS SYPHILIS RESULTS FOR 1 PATIENT SAMPLE ON A COBAS 8000 E 602 MODULE. THE ELECSYS SYPHILIS RESULT WAS 0.863 COI (NEGATIVE). THE RESULTS USING OTHER METHODS WERE: POSITIVE WITH THE TPPA METHOD, POSITIVE (4.69 UNIT OF MEASURE WAS NOT PROVIDED) WITH THE WAN200 (TREPONEMAL, CHEMICAL LUMINESCENCE TEST) METHOD, POSITIVE WITH THE IMMUNOGOLD (TREPONEMAL) METHOD, AND NEGATIVE WITH THE TRUST METHOD. THE QUESTIONABLE RESULT WAS NOT REPORTED OUTSIDE THE LABORATORY. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED DUE TO THE RESULT NOT MATCHING THE PATIENT'S CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20316093 ↗MalfunctionJun 13, 2024False Negative Result; False Negative Result
THE INITIAL REPORTER STATED THEY RECEIVED A FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE TESTED WITH ELECSYS SYPHILIS ON A COBAS 6000 E601 MODULE. NO QUESTIONABLE RESULTS WERE REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. THE VALUES MEASURED WITH THE ELECSYS SYPHILIS ASSAY DID NOT MATCH THE PATIENT'S CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS. THE PATIENT SAMPLE RESULTED IN A SYPHILIS VALUE OF 0.133 COI (NON-REACTIVE). THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED AND THE RESULT WAS STILL NEGATIVE. ELISA TESTING PERFORMED ON THE PATIENT SAMPLE RESULTED IN A VALUE OF 18.67 (REACTIVE WITH CUTOFF OF 0.14). NO UNITS OF MEASURE WERE PROVIDED FOR THE METHOD. IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHY TEST STRIPS, TPPA, AND RPR TESTING PERFORMED ON THE PATIENT WERE ALL POSITIVE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19527817 ↗MalfunctionSep 1, 2022False Negative Result; False Negative Result
THE INITIAL REPORTER QUESTIONED NEGATIVE RESULTS FOR 1 PATIENT TESTED FOR ELECSYS SYPHILIS (SYPHILIS) ON A COBAS 6000 E 601 MODULE. ON (B)(6) 2021: THE RESULT FROM THE E601 MODULE WAS 0.580 COI (NEGATIVE). THE RESULT FROM THE INTECH TREPONEMA PALLIDUM PARTICLE AGGLUTINATION (TPPA) METHOD WAS "POSITIVE." THE ACTUAL RESULT WAS NOT PROVIDED. ON (B)(6) 2022: THE RESULT FROM THE E601 MODULE WAS 0.790 COI (NEGATIVE). THE RESULT FROM THE INTECH TPPA METHOD WAS "POSITIVE." THE ACTUAL RESULT WAS NOT PROVIDED. ADDITIONAL SYPHILIS RESULTS WERE PROVIDED FROM 2 OTHER METHODS: THE RESULT FROM THE FUJIREBIO TPPA METHOD WAS "POSITIVE." THE ACTUAL RESULT WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE RESULT FROM THE TRUST METHOD WAS "NEGATIVE." THE ACTUAL RESULT WAS NOT PROVIDED. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE RESULTS FROM THE ADDITIONAL METHODS WERE FROM ONE OF THE SAMPLES FROM 2021 OR 2022 OR A DIFFERENT SAMPLE. CLARIFICATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT HAS NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED. THE QUESTIONABLE ROCHE RESULTS WERE REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. THE E601 MODULE SERIAL NUMBER WAS (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15333824 ↗MalfunctionJul 30, 2021False Negative Result; False Negative Result
THE INITIAL REPORTER RECEIVED QUESTIONABLE ELECSYS SYPHILIS RESULTS FOR ONE PATIENT TESTED ON TWO COBAS 8000 E 602 MODULES. THE PATIENT HAD TWO SAMPLES COLLECTED FOR TESTING. ON 16-JUN-2021, THE CUSTOMER PERFORMED SYPHILIS ANTIBODY TESTING ON AN ABBOTT ALINITY ANALYZER AND A MANUAL RPR SYPHILIS ANTIGEN TEST WITH THE PATIENT'S FIRST SAMPLE. FOR CONFIRMATION, THE CUSTOMER HAD A SECOND SAMPLE COLLECTED ON (B)(6) 2021. BOTH SAMPLES WERE TESTED ON THE E 602 MODULES AS WELL AS THE ABBOTT ALINITY ANALYZER. THE CUSTOMER PROVIDED A SERIAL NUMBER FOR ONE E 602 MODULE, (B)(4) , THE OTHER E 602 MODULE SERIAL NUMBER WAS REQUESTED BUT NOT PROVIDED. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT SPECIFY E 602 MODULE THE PROVIDED SERIAL NUMBER BELONGED TO. THE PATIENT'S ABBOTT SYPHILIS REACTIVE RESULTS WERE REPORTED OUTSIDE THE LABORATORY. THE PATIENT'S ELECSYS SYPHILIS NON-REACTIVE RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED OUTSIDE THE LABORATORY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12253270 ↗MalfunctionApr 25, 2019Low Test Results; Low Test Results
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES <NOE>1</NOE> MALFUNCTION EVENT. LOW RESULTS WERE GENERATED BY THE COBAS 8000 E 602 MODULE FOR ELECSYS SYPHILIS. THE EVENT INVOLVED A TOTAL OF 1 PATIENT. THERE PATIENT IS MALE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8549725 ↗
Other ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORPTION ASSAY, TREPONEMA PALLIDUM devices
- IMMULITE® 2000 Systems SYP Syphilis Screen 10471981Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products Ltd · ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORPTION ASSAY, TREPONEMA PALLIDUM1 recall0 reports
- Elecsys Syphilis 09015051190Roche Diagnostics GmbH · ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORPTION ASSAY, TREPONEMA PALLIDUM28 reports
- VITROS 6177333Ortho Clinical Diagnostics · ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORPTION ASSAY, TREPONEMA PALLIDUM13 reports
- Elecsys Syphilis 09014977190Roche Diagnostics GmbH · ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORPTION ASSAY, TREPONEMA PALLIDUM13 reports
- Elecsys Syphilis 07251378190Roche Diagnostics GmbH · ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORPTION ASSAY, TREPONEMA PALLIDUM7 reports
- Atellica IM Syph 10995675Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. · ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORPTION ASSAY, TREPONEMA PALLIDUM3 reports
- ADVIA Centaur® SYPH 10492493Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. · ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORPTION ASSAY, TREPONEMA PALLIDUM3 reports
- Trinity Biotech 800-970Clark Laboratories, Inc. · Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorption Assay, Treponema Pallidum1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page