Skip to content

RUSCH IPN050272Recalls & reported problems

Teleflex Incorporated · 100% Silicone Foley Balloon Catheter (2 Way) · Class 2

All models of RUSCH (220)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04026704335046), received between Apr 24, 2023 and Apr 24, 2023 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deflation Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Deflation Problem1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 24, 2023Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE ON A PATIENT, CATHETER LEAKS WERE FOUND. A BLADDER SCAN SHOWED EVIDENCE OF A HIGH VOLUME OF FLUID ALTHOUGH THE CATHETER WAS IN PLACE. THE BALLOON WAS TESTED BEFORE USE AND THE INFLATION VOLUME RESPECTED. THE LUBRICANT USED WAS OPTILUBE. DURING REMOVAL, THE BALLOON WAS NOT COMPLETELY DEFLATED DESPITE THE REMOVAL OF 10ML OF STERILE WATER THAT HAD BEEN INSERTED THE DAY BEFORE. A PRESENCE OF DEPOSIT ON THE TIP OF THE URINARY CATHETER WAS ALSO REPORTED. AS A RESULT, THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND 3-WAY CATHETER WAS INSERTED. NO HARM OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16796009 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 24, 2023Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE ON A PATIENT, CATHETER LEAKS WERE FOUND. A BLADDER SCAN SHOWED EVIDENCE OF A HIGH VOLUME OF FLUID ALTHOUGH THE CATHETER WAS IN PLACE. THE BALLOON WAS TESTED BEFORE USE AND THE INFLATION VOLUME RESPECTED. THE LUBRICANT USED WAS OPTILUBE. DURING REMOVAL, THE BALLOON WAS NOT COMPLETELY DEFLATED DESPITE THE REMOVAL OF 10ML OF STERILE WATER THAT HAD BEEN INSERTED THE DAY BEFORE. A PRESENCE OF DEPOSIT ON THE TIP OF THE URINARY CATHETER WAS ALSO REPORTED. AS A RESULT, THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND 3-WAY CATHETER WAS INSERTED. NO HARM OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16795960 ↗

Other CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON devices

All CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page