RUSCH IPN050272Recalls & reported problems
Teleflex Incorporated · 100% Silicone Foley Balloon Catheter (2 Way) · Class 2
All models of RUSCH (220)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04026704335046), received between Apr 24, 2023 and Apr 24, 2023 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deflation Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Deflation Problem1
- Fluid/Blood Leak1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 24, 2023Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE ON A PATIENT, CATHETER LEAKS WERE FOUND. A BLADDER SCAN SHOWED EVIDENCE OF A HIGH VOLUME OF FLUID ALTHOUGH THE CATHETER WAS IN PLACE. THE BALLOON WAS TESTED BEFORE USE AND THE INFLATION VOLUME RESPECTED. THE LUBRICANT USED WAS OPTILUBE. DURING REMOVAL, THE BALLOON WAS NOT COMPLETELY DEFLATED DESPITE THE REMOVAL OF 10ML OF STERILE WATER THAT HAD BEEN INSERTED THE DAY BEFORE. A PRESENCE OF DEPOSIT ON THE TIP OF THE URINARY CATHETER WAS ALSO REPORTED. AS A RESULT, THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND 3-WAY CATHETER WAS INSERTED. NO HARM OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16796009 ↗MalfunctionApr 24, 2023Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE ON A PATIENT, CATHETER LEAKS WERE FOUND. A BLADDER SCAN SHOWED EVIDENCE OF A HIGH VOLUME OF FLUID ALTHOUGH THE CATHETER WAS IN PLACE. THE BALLOON WAS TESTED BEFORE USE AND THE INFLATION VOLUME RESPECTED. THE LUBRICANT USED WAS OPTILUBE. DURING REMOVAL, THE BALLOON WAS NOT COMPLETELY DEFLATED DESPITE THE REMOVAL OF 10ML OF STERILE WATER THAT HAD BEEN INSERTED THE DAY BEFORE. A PRESENCE OF DEPOSIT ON THE TIP OF THE URINARY CATHETER WAS ALSO REPORTED. AS A RESULT, THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND 3-WAY CATHETER WAS INSERTED. NO HARM OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16795960 ↗
Other CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON devices
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON512 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON476 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® I.C. All-Silicone Foley Catheter 1758SI16C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON1 death383 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON234 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Temp Sensing Foley Catheter 119216MC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON167 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175814C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON153 reports
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON151 reports
- SureStep™ Foley Tray System Bard® Lubri-Sil® Foley Catheter Tray A942216C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON2 recalls46 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page