Skip to content

AESCULAP BC606RRecalls & reported problems

Aesculap AG · METZENBAUM Dissecting Scissors, curved, 7", (180 mm), blunt/blunt, non-sterile, reusable · Class 1

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04038653021826), received between Oct 7, 2021 and Oct 7, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 7, 2021Break; Break

    NO CHANGES REQUIRED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12591302 ↗
  • InjuryOct 7, 2021Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH BC606R - METZENBAUM SCISSORS CVD180MM. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION, THE SCISSORS BROKE DURING A CESAREAN (C) SECTION PROCEDURE. AN ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS NECESSARY. AN X-RAY WAS NOT REQUIRED, BUT PIECE RETRIEVAL WAS PERFORMED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE ADVERSE EVENT IS FILED UNDER (B)(4) REFERENCE (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12590417 ↗

Other SCISSORS, GENERAL, SURGICAL devices

All SCISSORS, GENERAL, SURGICAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page