MAGNUS 1180.16F6Recalls & reported problems
MAQUET GmbH · MAGNUS carbon-fibre table top · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04046768118355), received between Jan 28, 2025 and Jan 28, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Interrogate” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Interrogate1
- Positioning Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 28, 2025Positioning Failure; Failure to Interrogate; Positioning Failure; Failure to Interrogate
GETINGE BECAME AWARE OF AN ISSUE WITH ONE OF OUR TABLE TOP - 118016F6 - MAGNUS CARBON FIBRE TABLE TOP, 205CM BOLUS, USA USED WITH PHILIPS C-ARM DEVICE. AS IT WAS STATED, THE TABLE MOVEMENTS STOPPED WORKING AND THE FOLLOWING ALERT WAS DISPLAYED: "PHILIPS TUBE NOT WORKING. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK." ACCORDING TO THE PROVIDED INFORMATION, THE STAFF COULD NO LONGER SLIDE THE TABLE TOP BUT WERE ABLE TO MOVE THE PHILIPS C-ARM TO GET INTO THE SAME POSITION AND USE THE OVERRIDE FUNCTIONS TO MOVE THE COLUMN UP AND DOWN. DUE TO THE ISSUE, THE PATIENT WAS MOVED TO ANOTHER TABLE, WHICH CAUSED A DELAY OF APPROXIMATELY 10 MINUTES IN THE ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO INFORMATION PROVIDED FOLLOWING SERVICE VISIT ON SITE, THE LATERAL SHIFT DRIVE AND CONTROL UNIT WERE REPLACED. THE INCIDENT WAS INITIALLY ASSESSED AS REPORTABLE DUE TO A PROCEDURAL DELAY RELATED TO TRANSFER OF THE PATIENT TO ANOTHER OPERATING ROOM DURING PROCEDURE. RECENTLY, THE INCIDENT HAS BEEN REEVALUATED. IT HAS BEEN CONCLUDED THAT THE PROCEDURAL DELAY HAD MINOR CLINICAL RELEVANCE IN THIS SITUATION AND DID NOT LEAD TO ANY HEALTH CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PATIENT. THEREFORE, THE SCENARIO DESCRIBED IN THE RECORD IS CONSIDERED AS NON-R
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21251956 ↗
Other Table, Radiologic devices
- ORT300 TableIMRIS Imaging, Inc. · Table, Radiologic2 recalls6 reports
- NA 6265300GE Medical Systems, L.L.C. · Table, radiologic2 recalls0 reports
- PST500 4080300Baxter Medical Systems GmbH + Co. KG · Table, radiologic1 recall4 reports
- TS 7500 1730720Baxter Medical Systems GmbH + Co. KG · Table, radiologic1 recall1 report
- TS 7500 1854086Baxter Medical Systems GmbH + Co. KG · Table, radiologic1 recall0 reports
- TS 7500 1730732Baxter Medical Systems GmbH + Co. KG · Table, radiologic1 recall0 reports
- NA 6265300-20GE Medical Systems, L.L.C. · Table, radiologic1 recall0 reports
- TS 7000 1604786Baxter Medical Systems GmbH + Co. KG · Table, radiologic1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page