Skip to content

Universal table top 116010B0Recalls & reported problems

MAQUET GmbH · Class 1

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04046768133679), received between Nov 24, 2023 and May 22, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Circuit Failure” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 2 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Circuit Failure2
  • Positioning Failure2
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Localized Skin Lesion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2024Circuit Failure; Positioning Failure; Circuit Failure; Positioning Failure

    GETINGE BECAME AWARE OF AN ISSUE WITH ONE OF OUR TABLE TOPS - 116010B0 - UNIVERSAL TABLE TOP, SFC, EU USED WITH 1160 OTESUS OR TABLE COLUMN AND 100925A0 UNIVERSAL CONTROL DEVICE. AS IT WAS STATED, THE OPERATING TABLE COULD ONLY BE MOVED DOWN SPORADICALLY WITH THE PATIENT LYING ON HIS STOMACH. THE HAND CONTROL AND OVERRIDE PANEL DID NOT WORK. AFTER A WHILE, THE TABLE RESPONDED AGAIN. THERE WAS NO INJURY REPORTED, HOWEVER, WE DECIDED TO REPORT THE ISSUE BASED ON THE POTENTIAL FOR SERIOUS INJURY IF THE SITUATION, NAMELY OPERATING TABLE NOT RESPONDING TO REMOTE CONTROL NOR OVERRIDE PANEL LEADING TO INABILITY TO POSITION THE PATIENT AS REQUIRED, WAS TO REOCCUR.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19368815 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2024Circuit Failure; Positioning Failure; Circuit Failure; Positioning Failure

    GETINGE BECAME AWARE OF AN ISSUE WITH ONE OF OUR TABLE TOPS - 116010B0 - UNIVERSAL TABLE TOP, SFC, EU USED WITH 1160 OTESUS OR TABLE COLUMN AND 100925A0 UNIVERSAL CONTROL DEVICE. AS IT WAS STATED, THE OPERATING TABLE COULD ONLY BE MOVED DOWN SPORADICALLY DURING A FOREARM OPERATION ON THE ANESTHETIZED PATIENT. THE HAND CONTROL AND OVERRIDE PANEL DID NOT WORK. THERE WAS NO INJURY REPORTED, HOWEVER, WE DECIDED TO REPORT THE ISSUE BASED ON THE POTENTIAL FOR SERIOUS INJURY IF THE SITUATION, NAMELY OPERATING TABLE NOT RESPONDING TO REMOTE CONTROL NOR OVERRIDE PANEL LEADING TO INABILITY TO POSITION THE PATIENT AS REQUIRED, WAS TO REOCCUR.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19368814 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 24, 2023Use of Device Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Use of Device Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ON 17TH NOVEMBER 2023 GETINGE BECAME AWARE OF AN ISSUE WITH ONE OF OUR TABLE TOPS - 116010B0 - UNIVERSAL TABLE TOP, SFC, EU USED WITH 113353BC - PAIR OF LEG PLATES WITH CODE PLUG. AS IT WAS STATED, THE FOLLOWING COURSE OF EVENTS OCCURRED. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT HAD A CESAREAN SECTION. WHEN CLOSING THE WOUND, THE PATIENT'S LEGS WERE RAISED AND FOLDED TOGETHER WHICH RESULTED IN INCREASED PRESSURE ON THE TISSUE ON THE LOWER BACK. NO FURTHER OR ADDITIONAL MEDICAL TREATMENT WAS NECESSARY IN THE CLINIC AND THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED AFTER A STANDARD HOSPITAL STAY ON (B)(6) 2023. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT CALLED THE DELIVERY ROOM AND REPORTED THAT SHE HAD DISCOVERED A PRESSURE POINT ON HER BACK. ACCORDING TO THE CUSTOMER'S ALLEGATION, CHANGING OF THE OPERATING TABLES INCREASED THE RISK OF SKIN DAMAGE. WE DECIDED TO REPORT THE ISSUE BASED ON THE POTENTIAL FOR SERIOUS INJURY IF THE SITUATION, NAMELY THE PATIENT EXPERIENCING PRESSURE POINTS AFTER PROCEDURE ON THE 116010B0 - UNIVERSAL TABLE TOP, WAS TO REOCCUR.

    Patient problems: Localized Skin Lesion

    MAUDE report 18203338 ↗

Other TABLE, OPERATING-ROOM, AC-POWERED devices

All TABLE, OPERATING-ROOM, AC-POWERED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page