Contiplex® 332170Recalls & reported problems
B. Braun Medical Inc. · Contiplex® Echo Tray with Contiplex Ultra 360 Needle · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04046955150663), received between Jul 20, 2020 and Jul 24, 2020 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Difficult to Remove1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 24, 2020Break; Break
AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: EVENT 1: END USER REPORTS THAT THE CATHETER IS SHEARING DURING USE. NO INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10323028 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2020Break; Break
AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: EVENT 3: END USER REPORTS THAT THE CATHETER IS SHEARING DURING USE. NO INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10323026 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2020Break; Break
AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: EVENT 2: END USER REPORTS THAT THE CATHETER IS SHEARING DURING USE. NO INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10323017 ↗MalfunctionJul 20, 2020Difficult to Remove; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Difficult to Remove; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS UNABLE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AFTER BEING IN PLACE FOR SEVERAL DAYS. THE CATHETER WAS A FEMORAL NERVE CATHETER AND REQUIRED A SURGICAL PROCEDURE TO HAVE THE CATHETER REMOVED. PATIENT INJURY - SURGICAL PROCEDURE REQUIRED TO REMOVE CATHETER
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10295624 ↗
Other Anesthesia conduction kit devices
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405671Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall68 reports
- ARROW IPN922678Teleflex Incorporated · Anesthesia conduction kit2 recalls0 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405672Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall27 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405673Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall10 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405637Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall7 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405707Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall4 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405609Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405735Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.