Skip to content

Perifix® 332200Recalls & reported problems

B. Braun Medical Inc. · PERIFIX® Continuous Epidural Set 18 Ga. x 3 1/2 in. (90mm) Tuohy Needle Set with 20 Ga. Closed Tip Nylon Catheter · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04046964178061), received between Apr 11, 2018 and Aug 15, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 2 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 15, 2025Break; Break

    AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: DETAILED INQUIRY DESCRIPTION: ON MONDAY (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT HAD AN EPIDURAL CATHETER PLACED INTRAOPERATIVELY FOR PAIN CONTROL FOLLOWING A MULTI-LEVEL POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION. ON POD 2 WHEN THE PA WAS REVVING THE CATHETER, IT SEPARATED, AND A SECTION OF THE CATHETER REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BACK. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE OR LATER THAT AFTERNOON FOR AN EXPLORATION OF THE POST-OP LUMBAR WOUND AND REMOVAL OF THE RETAINED EPIDURAL CATHETER. THE SEGMENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. BOTH THE ANESTHESIOLOGIST & THE SURGEON FEEL THAT THE CATHETER WAS DEFECTIVE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22814797 ↗
  • InjuryJul 10, 2025Break; Break

    AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: DETAILED INQUIRY DESCRIPTION: ON MONDAY (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT HAD AN EPIDURAL CATHETER PLACED INTRAOPERATIVELY FOR PAIN CONTROL FOLLOWING A MULTI-LEVEL POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION. ON POD 2 WHEN THE PA WAS REVVING THE CATHETER, IT SEPARATED, AND A SECTION OF THE CATHETER REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BACK. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE OR LATER THAT AFTERNOON FOR AN EXPLORATION OF THE POST-OP LUMBAR WOUND AND REMOVAL OF THE RETAINED EPIDURAL CATHETER. THE SEGMENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. BOTH THE ANESTHESIOLOGIST & THE SURGEON FEEL THAT THE CATHETER WAS DEFECTIVE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22468094 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2025Break; Break

    AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: DETAILED INQUIRY DESCRIPTION: ON MONDAY, (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT HAD AN EPIDURAL CATHETER PLACED INTRAOPERATIVELY FOR PAIN CONTROL FOLLOWING A MULTI-LEVEL POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION. ON POD 2 WHEN THE PA WAS REVVING THE CATHETER, IT SEPARATED, AND A SECTION OF THE CATHETER REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BACK. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE OR LATER THAT AFTERNOON FOR AN EXPLORATION OF THE POST-OP LUMBAR WOUND AND REMOVAL OF THE RETAINED EPIDURAL CATHETER. THE SEGMENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. BOTH THE ANESTHESIOLOGIST AND THE SURGEON FEEL THAT THE CATHETER WAS DEFECTIVE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22457150 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 11, 2018Break; Break

    AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: IT WAS REPORTED THAT 22CM OF THE 20G CATHETER SHEARED OFF IN A PATIENT WHILE PULLING BACK THROUGH THE18G NEEDLE. PATIENT WAS SEEN IN FOR CAUDALLY THREADED EPIDURAL INFUSION UP TO L5/S1 LEVEL. SACRAL HIATUS WAS IDENTIFIED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY. AREA WAS PREPPED AND DRAPED IN ROUTINE MANNER. SKIN AND SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE WERE INFILTRATED WITH 4 ML OF 1% LIDOCAINE. USING A 17 GAUGE 3.5 INCH TOUHY NEEDLE THE CAUDAL EPIDURAL SPACE WAS CONFIRMED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY. THE EPIDURAL CATHETER WAS THREADED THROUGH TOUHY NEEDLE AND 2ML OF CONTRAST SPREAD WAS VISUALIZED AT L5/S1 LEVEL. AFTER NEGATIVE ASPIRATION A TOTAL OF 10ML OF 0.5% LIDOCAINE WITH 80MG OF DEPOMEDROL WAS INJECTED WITHOUT RESISTANCE. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF SPINAL ANESTHESIA OR INTRAVASCULAR INJECTION. UPON REMOVAL OF CATHETER IT WAS NOTICED THAT TIP WAS NOT INTACT. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE DURING CATHETER REMOVAL. PATIENT HAD NO INCREASED PAIN, NUMBNESS OR BLE WEAKNESS. NO LOSS OF BOWEL/BLADDER FUNCTION. ORTHOPEDICS SPINE WAS CONSULTED REGARDING POSSIBLE INTERVENTION REGARDING RETAINED CATHETER WHICH IS ABOUT 20CM. PATIENT AND HIS WIFE WERE SPOKEN TO AFTER PROCEDURE AND INFORMED OF RETAINED CATHETER.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 7421734 ↗

Other Epidural anesthesia kit devices

All Epidural anesthesia kit devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page