Perifix® 333514Recalls & reported problems
B. Braun Medical Inc. · 19 Ga. x 36 in. Radiopaque Polyamide Springwound PERIFIX® FX Catheter - open tip with catheter connector and threading assist guide · Class 2
All models of Perifix (57)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04046964179907), received between Aug 8, 2022 and Jun 3, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 3, 2025Break; Break
PER MEDWATCH NUMBER (B)(4): DESCRIBE EVENT OR PROBLEM: THE CATHETER SHEARED WHILE BEING REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE WIRE COIL SEPARATED FROM THE PLASTIC SHEATH. A PORTION OF THE PLASTIC SHEATH APPEARS TO HAVE REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PLASTIC SHEATH WAS UNABLE TO BE LOCATED ON CT OR MRI. THE MANUFACTURER HAS INFORMED US THAT THE PLASTIC SHEATH IS RADIO TRANSLUCENT, WHILE THE WIRE COIL IS RADIOPAQUE. THIS IS LIKELY WHY WE WERE UNABLE TO VISUALIZE THE PLASTIC SHEATH WITH IMAGING (THE WIRE COIL SEPARATED FROM THE PLASTIC SHEATH, SO THE WIRE COIL WAS FULLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT). THE PRODUCT SAFETY CONCERN IN THIS CASE IS THAT THE PLASTIC SHEATH IS NOT RADIOPAQUE. MAKING THE PLASTIC SHEATH RADIOPAQUE WOULD ALLOW FOR IT TO BE LOCATED IN SITUATIONS SUCH AS THESE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 22131706 ↗MalfunctionAug 8, 2022Break; Break
AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: DETAILS OF COMPLAINT: "CATHETER PUSHED IN HOWEVER RESISTANCE MET. I ATTEMPTED TO PULL CATHETER OUT, HOWEVER I BEGAN TO SEE THE SPRINGROUND COIL AND NOT THE FULL SURROUNDING PLASTIC CATHETER. I BELIEVE I THEN REMOVED BOTH THE EPIDURAL NEEDLE AND CATHETER AND FOUND THE PLASTIC CATHETER THAT REMAINED WAS MISSING A LITTLE PAST THE 5 CM MARKING. THE INNER SPRINGROUND COIL SEEMED TO BE FULLY REMOVED. I HAD TO CALL SPINE SURGERY TO COME IN FOR A CONSULT AS NOW THERE IS POTENTIAL 5 CM OF PLASTIC CATHETER THAT REMAINS IN HER BACK OF UNKNOWN LOCATION AS CATHETER BROKE. PATIENT IS PENDING A LOWER SPINE X RAY AND REASSESSMENT BY SPINE SURGERY. "
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 15189122 ↗
Other Epidural anesthesia kit devices
- Design Options® 552116B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit2 recalls7 reports
- Design Options® 552126B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit2 recalls0 reports
- Design Options® 552179B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit2 recalls0 reports
- Design Options® 552177B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit2 recalls0 reports
- Perifix® 332079B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit1 recall45 reports
- Perifix® 332097B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit1 recall39 reports
- Perifix® 332220B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit1 recall21 reports
- Perifix® 332078B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit1 recall12 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page