Perifix® 333532Recalls & reported problems
B. Braun Medical Inc. · 20 Ga. x 40 in. Polyamide Styleted PERIFIX® Catheter - closed tip with catheter connector and threading assist guide · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04046964179969), received between Apr 4, 2023 and Jul 2, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 2, 2025Break; Break
AS REPORTED VIA MEDWATCH NUMBER MW5171434: DESCRIBE EVENT OR PROBLEM: POSTPARTUM COURSE WAS UNCOMPLICATED FROM AN OBSTETRIC PERSPECTIVE ALTHOUGH PATIENT RETAINED FRAGMENT OF EPIDURAL CATHETER FOLLOWING REMOVAL BY ANESTHESIA. THEY'RE CONCERNS FOR POSSIBLE RETAINED CATHETER FRAGMENT APPROXIMATELY 1 CM IN LENGTH PRESUMED TO BE RETAINED SUBCUTANEOUSLY. THE PATIENT, LABOR AND DELIVERY (L&D) NURSES AND SUPERVISING ANESTHESIA ATTENDING WERE IMMEDIATELY INFORMED. A DECISION WAS MADE TO OBTAIN A COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) SCAN OF THE LUMBAR SPINE TO EVALUATE FOR RETAINED CATHETER FRAGMENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 22382781 ↗MalfunctionApr 4, 2023Break; Break
AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: REPORTED ISSUE: APPROXIMATELY 2CM OF THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE CATHETER WAS RETAINED IN THE PATIENT FOLLOWING THE REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER. THE DEVICE FRAGMENT IS IN THE PATIENT'S CAUDAL AREA AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED WITHOUT AN ADDITIONAL SURGICAL PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY THE SURGEON EXPLAINED THE EMBEDDED FRAGMENT TO THE PATIENT AND THAT REMOVAL WOULD REQUIRE AN ACTUAL IN-PATIENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT WAS PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS AND TOLD THAT THE DEVICE IS MADE OF MATERIAL THAT CAN BE SURGICALLY IMPLANTED FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TIME AND THAT THERE IS A VERY LOW CHANCE OF "HIGH RATE OF INFECTION". THE PATIENT HAS OPTED TO NOT HAVE THE DEVICE FRAGMENT REMOVED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 16676356 ↗
Other Epidural anesthesia kit devices
- Design Options® 552116B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit2 recalls7 reports
- Design Options® 552177B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit2 recalls0 reports
- Design Options® 552179B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit2 recalls0 reports
- Design Options® 552126B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit2 recalls0 reports
- Perifix® 332079B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit1 recall45 reports
- Perifix® 332097B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit1 recall39 reports
- Perifix® 332220B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit1 recall21 reports
- Perifix® 332078B. Braun Medical Inc. · Epidural anesthesia kit1 recall12 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page