Skip to content

SPROTTE 041251-29ARecalls & reported problems

Pajunk GmbH Medizintechnologie · Distal Tip: SPROTTE® Proximal End: ISO 80369-7 · Class 2

All models of SPROTTE (32)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04048223104316), received between Jun 21, 2021 and Jul 2, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Fracture2

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 2, 2025Break; Break

    IRN# (B)(4). INCIDENT OCCURRED IN ITALY: WHILE REMOVING THE NEEDLE TO CHANGE POSITION, IT BROKE AND THE STUMP REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT, IMPOSSIBLE TO REMOVE WITH BARE HANDS (ABOUT 4.5CM). THEREFORE, THE PATIENT REQUIRED A DIAGNOSTIC-THERAPEUTIC PATHWAY, WHICH ENDED WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE STUMP BY THE NEUROSURGERY COLLEAGUES. NO NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE WAS REPORTED IN THE PATIENT THROUGHOUT THE PERIPROCEDURAL PATHWAY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22381699 ↗
  • InjuryJul 26, 2022Fracture; Fracture

    IRN-# 191-22_761. EVENT TOOK PLACE IN FRANCE, TENTATIVE TRANSLATION OF INITIAL REPORTER´S NARRATIVE: DURING A LUMBAR PUNCTURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE IN THE PATIENT'S BACK. ON REMOVAL, A PORTION REMAINED IN THE SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE. USUAL LUMBAR PUNCTURE TECHNIQUE (USE OF INTRODUCTER AND STILET IN THE NEEDLE DURING REMOVAL) OVERWEIGHT PAEDIATRIC PATIENT 137 KG. ADMITTED TO THE NEUROSURGERY UNIT ON 22 JUNE FOR PLACEMENT OF A VENTRICULO-ATRIAL SHUNT AND REMOVAL OF THE NEEDLE FRAGMENT. INFECTION OF THE SHUNT LEADING TO RE-HOSPITALIZATION OF THE PATIENT WITH REMOVAL OF THE SHUNT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 15101393 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 21, 2021Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture

    IRN# (B)(4). TENTATIVE SUMMARIZING TRANSLATION FROM INITIAL REPORTER´S NARRATIVE: "DURING SEVERAL ATTEMPTS TO PLACE THE NEEDLE IN THE SPINAL SPACE AT L2-L3 (AFTER SEVERAL UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS TO PLACE IT IN L3-L4) THE NEEDLE BROKE AT 3 CM DURING THE REMOVAL PROCEDURE OF THE NEEDLE WITH ITS INTRODUCER. DURING THE PROCEDURE I HAD NEVER CSF FLOW THROUGH THE NEEDLE AND WE HAD NO PARESTESIA. AT THE END THE PATIENT MOVES THE LEGS WITHOUT ANY SENSITIVE OR PHISICAL PROBLEMS. WE CALLED THE SURGEON TO TRY TO SURGICALLY REMOVE THE TIP OF THE NEEDLE WITH LOCAL ANESTHESIA AND SEDATION, AFTER TALKING TO THE PATIENT. FINALLY WE SUCCEDED IN REMOVING THE NEEDLE".

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 12030751 ↗

Other NEEDLE, CONDUCTION, ANESTHETIC (W/WO INTRODUCER) devices

All NEEDLE, CONDUCTION, ANESTHETIC (W/WO INTRODUCER) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page