Skip to content

SONOTAP II 1265-3E080Recalls & reported problems

Pajunk GmbH Medizintechnologie · 1265-3E080 · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04048223116241), received between Jul 10, 2024 and Jul 10, 2024 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2024Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

    IRN# (B)(4). LORS DE LA RÉALISATION D'UN BLOC TRÈS PROFOND, IL A ÉTÉ CONSTATÉ QUE L'AIGUILLE S'EST CASSÉE EN SON EMBOUT LORS D'UN LÉGER CHANGEMENT DE DIRECTION AFIN D'AFFINER L'IMAGE. LE MÉDECIN A RÉUSSI À RETENIR L'AIGUILLE AFIN D'ÉVITER LA PERTE IN SITU CHEZ LE PATIENT DE 21 ANS. IL N'Y A PAS EU DE CONSÉQUENCE CLINIQUE MAIS CET INCIDENT A PRÉSENTÉ LE RISQUE DE LA PERTE IN SITU. IL S'AGIT DU PREMIER INCIDENT DE CE TYPE. DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF A VERY DEEP BLOCK, THE NEEDLE WAS FOUND TO HAVE BROKEN OFF AT ITS TIP DURING A SLIGHT CHANGE OF DIRECTION TO REFINE THE IMAGE. THE DOCTOR MANAGED TO RETAIN THE NEEDLE TO AVOID IN SITU LOSS IN THE 21-YEAR-OLD PATIENT. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES, BUT THIS INCIDENT PRESENTED THE RISK OF IN SITU LOSS. THIS IS THE FIRST INCIDENT OF ITS KIND.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19711739 ↗

Other NEEDLE, CONDUCTION, ANESTHETIC (W/WO INTRODUCER) devices

All NEEDLE, CONDUCTION, ANESTHETIC (W/WO INTRODUCER) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page