Skip to content

SPROTTE® NRFit 021163-29A (UDI 04048223127841)Recalls & reported problems

Pajunk GmbH Medizintechnologie · SPROTTE® NRFit 25G x 3 1/2" (90mm) with magnification and IntroDucer NRFit 30mm, sterile · Class 2

All models of SPROTTE NRFit (7)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04048223127841), received between Dec 5, 2025 and Dec 5, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 5, 2025Break; Break

    (B)(4). INCIDENT OCCURRED IN UK. ATTEMPTED SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR MAJOR ROBOTIC UROLOGY SURGERY. UPON REMOVAL OF THE NEEDLE AND THE INTRODUCER TOGETHER TO ATTEMPT A FINAL TIME WITH A LONGER 25G NEEDLE, I NOTICED THAT THE PART OF THE SPINAL NEEDLE WAS RETAINED. THE NEEDLE BROKE AT THE LEVEL OF THE INTRODUCER WITH THE TIP RETAINED IN THE SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE. NO RESISTANCE OR DIFFICULTY IN REMOVING OR INSERTING THE NEEDLE. I JUST HIT THE BONE A FEW TIMES DURING THE ATTEMPTS. NEEDLE VISUALISED WITH US. EXPLAINED TO THE PATIENT THAT WE WOULD NEED TO SURGICALLY REMOVE THE NEEDLE. SHE UNDERSTOOD THE SITUATION AND AGREED TO PROCEED. DECIDED TO PUT HER UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA TO PERFORM XRAY AND PROCEED WITH THE REMOVAL. SHE AGREED TO CONTINUE WITH PLANNED SURGERY IF REMOVAL UNCOMPLICATED. TOTAL LIDOCAINE 1% 20 MLS. SPINE SURGICAL TEAM ARRIVED. NEEDLE WAS IDENTIFIED WITH FLUOROSCOPY AND REMOVED. PATIENT WAS PRONED FOR THE PROCEDURE AND THE SURGICAL WOULD WAS OF ABOUT 1 INCH IN LENGTH. UNEVENTFUL PROCEDURE WITH NO IMMEDIATE COMPLICATION. THE NEEDLE WAS FOUND AT THE LEVEL OF L2 CLOSE TO THE SPINOUS PROCESS, FAR FROM THE SPINAL CANAL. AFTER THE NEEDLE WAS REMOVED WE PROCEED WITH THE PLANNED

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 23725456 ↗

Other NEEDLE, CONDUCTION, ANESTHETIC (W/WO INTRODUCER) devices

All NEEDLE, CONDUCTION, ANESTHETIC (W/WO INTRODUCER) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page