Skip to content

LACRIFLOW LF-R090ARecalls & reported problems

Kaneka Corporation · The LACRIFLOW is indicated in treatments of epiphora in-patients 12 months and older, in cases of: - Canalicular pathologies (stenosis, obstruction, lacerations), - During Dacryocystorhinostomy (conventional or laser), - Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. · Class U · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04540778140875), received between Jun 2, 2021 and Jun 15, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method2

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 15, 2021Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    THE DOCTOR FELT THE BOUGIE PIERCED THROUGH THE TUBE AS SHE ADVANCED THE LACRIMAL TUBE. SHE RECOVERED THE LACRIMAL TUBE FROM THE PATIENT'S LACRIMAL DUCT AND FOUND THAT IT HAD A HOLE. WHEN THE ACTUAL DEVICE USED WAS INVESTIGATED, THE RING WAS DISMOUNTED AND MISSING. THE RING'S WHEREABOUTS WAS NOT CONFIRMED DURING THE PROCEDURE IN THIS EYE CLINIC, AND ACCORDINGLY, IT HAS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE MISSING STAINLESS STEEL RING MIGHT HAVE BEEN REMAINING IN THE PATIENT BODY. THIS DEVICE IS THE SAME DEVICE AS THE US NAME LACRIFLOW (510 (K) # K120886).

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 12005913 ↗
  • InjuryJun 2, 2021Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    THE DOCTOR FELT THE BOUGIE PIERCED THROUGH THE TUBE AS HE ADVANCED THE LACRIMAL TUBE. SHE RECOVERED THE LACRIMAL TUBE FROM THE PATIENT'S LACRIMAL DUCT AND FOUND THAT SHE HAD A HOLE. WHEN THE ACTUAL DEVICE USED WAS INVESTIGATED, THE RING WAS DISMOUNTED AND MISSING. THE RING'S WHEREABOUTS WAS NOT CONFIRMED DURING THE PROCEDURE IN THIS EYE CLINIC, AND ACCORDINGLY, IT HAS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE MISSING STAINLESS STEEL RING MIGHT HAVE BEEN REMAINING IN THE PATIENT BODY. THIS DEVICE IS THE SAME DEVICE AS THE US NAME LACRIFLOW (510 (K) # K120886).

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 11918460 ↗

Other Lacrimal Stents And Intubation Sets devices

All Lacrimal Stents And Intubation Sets devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page