STENTube Lacrimal Intubation Set LIS052Recalls & reported problems
Quest Medical Inc · Class U
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10634624815527), received between Jun 23, 2016 and Sep 1, 2017 — classified as 3 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Damaged Prior to Use1
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Device Slipped1
- Disassembly1
- Material Fragmentation1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 1, 2017Device Slipped
THE HOSPITAL REPORTED AN ISSUE ENCOUNTERED WITH THE LACRIMAL INTUBATION TUBE DURING USE. THE REPORT STATED THAT THE CATHETER WAS "SLIPPING OUT OF THE SILVER (DELIVERY TUBE)." THE REPORT STATED THE PHYSICAL COULD NOT GET IT TO STAY IN THE TUBE SO THAT IT COULD BE PUT INTO PLACE, AND THAT THIS ACTUALLY OCCURRED WITH TWO DEVICES. AS A RESULT OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE, THE PHYSICIAN OPENED A 3RD STENT AND TIED A 7-0 SILK AROUND IT SO THAT THE CATHETER WOULD NOT SLIDE OUT OF THE DELIVERY TUBE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6840482 ↗MalfunctionAug 3, 2017Break
THE FACILITY'S PURCHASING COORDINATOR REPORTED THAT WHEN THE PHYSICIAN WAS USING THE LACRIMAL INTUBATION SET, THE TUBING BROKE ON 4 OF THEM (SAME LOT). THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE ALLEGED REPORT. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6762653 ↗InjuryJun 20, 2017Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE SURGERY CENTER REPORTED AN ISSUE WITH THE STENTUBE LACRIMAL INTUBATION DEVICE DURING USE. THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT OF THREE (3) DEVICES THEY USED, THEY "JUST FELL APART" DURING USE. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS PROVIDED OTHER THAN THEY WERE FROM THE SAME LOT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE. THE ACTUAL DEVICES WERE NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION; HOWEVER, ONE REMAINING DEVICE FROM THE SAME LOT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6656085 ↗MalfunctionMar 23, 2017Break; Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Operates Differently Than Expected
THE USER FACILITY NOTIFIED THE MANUFACTURER THAT THEY HAVE HAD MULTIPLE FAILURES OF THE MODEL LIS052 STENT TUBES. THEY STATED THEY HAD RECEIVED 6 BOXES (2 INTUBATION TUBES PER BOX) BUT THE FIRST 3-4 BOXES FAILED DUE TO "LITERALLY FALLING APART" WITH THE SILICONE WAS COMING OFF AS THE SURGEON TRIED TO PLACE THEM DURING THE PROCEDURES. NO SPECIFIC DETAILS REGARDING ANY OF THE PROCEDURES OR PATIENTS WAS PROVIDED; HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO MENTION OF ANY PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THE ALLEGED EVENTS STATED IN THE ORIGINAL REPORT. ATTEMPTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM USER FACILITY HAVE NOT BEEN SUCCESSFUL. USER FACILITY INDICATED THEY WERE RETURNING A SAMPLE FOR EVALUATION BUT NO SAMPLES HAVE BEEN RETURNED AS OF THE DATE OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6428414 ↗InjuryMar 22, 2017Disassembly
THE MATERIALS MANAGER OF THE SURGERY CENTER REPORTED THAT AN ISSUE WAS ENCOUNTERED WITH THE STENT TUBE INTUBATION SET DURING USE. THE REPORT STATED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, ONE OF THE STENT TUBES "FELL APART." THE REPORT STATED THAT THE SURGEON HAD USED ONE OF THE STENT TUBES FROM THE BOX, BUT THE OTHER FELL APART SO HE OPENED ANOTHER BOX TO OBTAIN A THIRD ONE FOR USE. THERE WAS NO INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDING THE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE ALLEGED EVENT. THE SET WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6426350 ↗InjuryJun 23, 2016Break; Material Fragmentation
THE HOSPITAL PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORTED AN ISSUE ENCOUNTERED BY THE PHYSICIAN WHILE USING THE LACRIMAL INTUBATION SET. THE REPORT STATED THAT PIECES OF THE DEVICE BROKE INTO THE PATIENT'S EYE WHILE THE PHYSICIAN WAS INSERTING IT DURING A RIGHT ENDOSCOPIC DACRYOADENOTOMY. THE REPORT STATED THE SURGICAL SITE WAS EXAMINED TO RETRIEVE THE BROKEN PIECES AND ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE ALLEGED EVENT. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION; IT IS WITH THE HOSPITAL'S CLINICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5746348 ↗
Other Lacrimal Stents And Intubation Sets devices
- LacriCATH LDC213TQuest Medical Inc · Lacrimal Stents And Intubation Sets8 reports
- LACRIFLOW LF-R090AKaneka Corporation · Lacrimal Stents And Intubation Sets2 reports
- LacriCATH LDC315TQuest Medical Inc · Lacrimal Stents And Intubation Sets1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page