Skip to content

XIA II 03820645Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · MONOXIAL SCREW · Class 2 · Implant

All models of XIA II (34)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540148919), received between Sep 7, 2016 and Aug 31, 2023 — classified as 5 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture6
  • Break3
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • Injury3
  • Pain2
  • Failure of Implant1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 31, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY TO ADDRESS A FRACTURED XIA LP MONOAXIAL SCREW.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17667180 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2019Fracture; Fracture

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY TO ADDRESS A FRACTURED XIA LP MONOAXIAL SCREW. THE CONSTRUCT WAS REMOVED BUT THE BROKEN SHAFT OF THE SCREW COULD NOT BE EXPLANTED SINCE, "THE IMPLANT PLACE OF SCREW WAS VERY DEEP."

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 9359879 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 20, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT SPINAL SURGERY MORE THAN ONE YEAR AGO FOR LUMBAR SPINE INJURY (INTERNAL FIXATION.) IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RECOVERED VERY WELL POST OPERATION. ON (B)(6) 2019 WHEN THE DOCTOR ARRANGED TO REMOVE THE PLATE, IT WAS NOTICED VIA X-RAY THAT A SCREW WAS FRACTURED. SINCE THE PATIENT HAD NO COMPLAINT OF DISCOMFORT, THE SURGEON MADE THE DECISION TO LEAVE THE FRACTURED SCREW IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8718990 ↗
  • InjuryJun 13, 2018Break; Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SCREW WAS FOUND BROKEN POST OPERATIVELY. THE PATIENT HAD SPINAL FUSION SURGERY TWO AND A HALF YEARS AGO. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO REMOVE THE FRACTURED SCREW.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Injury

    MAUDE report 7597826 ↗
  • InjuryMar 20, 2017Break; Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; THE PATIENT WAS FOUND AS L4-5LDR IN 2015. THE DOCTOR INSERTED 4 6.5*45MM SCREWS AND 1 CAGE. ONE YEAR AFTER OPERATION, THE PATIENT FELT BACK PAIN, AND X-RAY SHOWED THE SCREW IS BROKEN. ONE SCREW'NECK IS BROKEN. DOCTOR NEEDS USE ANOTHER SCREW INSTEAD.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 6419437 ↗
  • InjurySep 7, 2016Break; Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW WAS BROKEN.

    Patient problems: No Information; Pain

    MAUDE report 5934188 ↗

Other Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices

All Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page