Skip to content

T2 1822-1134SRecalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Tibial Nail, Standard · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540198044), received between Mar 11, 2022 and Aug 9, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 3 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • Impaired Healing2
  • Discomfort1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 9, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PRESENT SWISS TRAUMA FRACTURE REGISTRY (SWTR) IS A PROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER, OBSERVATIONAL STUDY TO COLLECT DATA ON ALL STRYKER TRAUMA AND EXTREMITIES PRODUCTS WITH THE AIM TO ADD TO THE EXISTING CLINICAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE OF STRYKER IMPLANTS FOR THE APPROVED INDICATIONS FOR USE. THE SWTR CAPTURES DATA EVALUATING THE REAL-WORLD USAGE OF STRYKER IMPLANTS AT TRAUMA CENTERS WITH THE CAPACITY, TRAINING, AND EXPERIENCE TO GATHER CLINICALLY RELEVANT STANDARD OF CARE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE ENDPOINT DATA. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, DELAYED UNION WAS NOTED FOR THIS PATIENT DURING THE FOLLOW-UP VISIT.

    Patient problems: Impaired Healing

    MAUDE report 19956403 ↗
  • InjuryAug 9, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PRESENT SWISS TRAUMA FRACTURE REGISTRY (SWTR) IS A PROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER, OBSERVATIONAL STUDY TO COLLECT DATA ON ALL STRYKER TRAUMA AND EXTREMITIES PRODUCTS WITH THE AIM TO ADD TO THE EXISTING CLINICAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE OF STRYKER IMPLANTS FOR THE APPROVED INDICATIONS FOR USE. THE SWTR CAPTURES DATA EVALUATING THE REAL-WORLD USAGE OF STRYKER IMPLANTS AT TRAUMA CENTERS WITH THE CAPACITY, TRAINING, AND EXPERIENCE TO GATHER CLINICALLY RELEVANT STANDARD OF CARE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE ENDPOINT DATA. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, DELAYED UNION WAS NOTED FOR THIS PATIENT DURING THE FOLLOW-UP VISIT.

    Patient problems: Impaired Healing

    MAUDE report 19954215 ↗
  • InjuryAug 8, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PRESENT SWISS TRAUMA FRACTURE REGISTRY (SWTR) IS A PROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER, OBSERVATIONAL STUDY TO COLLECT DATA ON ALL STRYKER TRAUMA AND EXTREMITIES PRODUCTS WITH THE AIM TO ADD TO THE EXISTING CLINICAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE OF STRYKER IMPLANTS FOR THE APPROVED INDICATIONS FOR USE. THE SWTR CAPTURES DATA EVALUATING THE REAL-WORLD USAGE OF STRYKER IMPLANTS AT TRAUMA CENTERS WITH THE CAPACITY, TRAINING, AND EXPERIENCE TO GATHER CLINICALLY RELEVANT STANDARD OF CARE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE ENDPOINT DATA. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, PERSISTENT PAIN WAS NOTED FOR THIS PATIENT DURING THE FOLLOW-UP VISIT.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 19938371 ↗
  • InjuryJun 23, 2022Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILST CONNECTING A T2 TIBIAL NAIL TO THE T2 SUPRAPATELLA NAIL ADAPTOR, THE SURGEON NOTED THAT ALTHOUGH THE NAIL WAS CORRECTLY ALIGNED WITH THE ADAPTOR, IT STILL HAD SOME MOVEMENT. HE TIGHTENED THE BOLT AS MUCH AS HE COULD TO NO AVAIL. HE DECIDED TO REMOVE THE BOLT AND TRY AGAIN ONLY TO FIND THAT THIS WAS NOT POSSIBLE. THE BOLT APPEARED TO HAVE COLD WELDED INTO THE NAIL. THE SURGEON HAD TO SWITCH TO THE INFRAPATELLA INCISION. HE HAD ALREADY COMPLETED REAMING THROUGH THE SUPRAPATELLA INCISION SO THE CHANGE WAS RELATIVELY SIMPLE. HE REAMED TO THE NEXT NAIL DIAMETER AND INSERTED THE NAIL USING THE T2 INFRAPATELLA NAIL ADAPTOR. THERE WAS A DELAY OF ABOUT 10 MINUTES IN THE PROCEDURE WHILST THE SURGEON TRIED TO SEPARATE THE NAIL FROM THE BOLT. THE PATIENT WAS ADVERSELY AFFECTED, AS AN EXTRA INCISION HAD TO BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEW ENTRY POINT FOR THE NAIL.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14787444 ↗
  • InjuryMar 11, 2022Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    AS REPORTED: "THE NAIL WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2015. IT IS A STRYKER TIBIAL NAIL T2 STRYKER, 345 MM, SIZE 11. POSTOPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT INITIALLY UNDERWENT PARTIAL WEIGHT-BEARING FOR 2 WEEKS AND THEN FULL WEIGHT-BEARING DEPENDING ON THE DEGREE OF DISCOMFORT. THE PATIENT WAS FOLLOWED UP REGULARLY BY THE SURGEON IN CONSULTATION. THE METAL REMOVAL TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2021. ALL LOCKING PINS WERE REMOVED THERE BUT THE NAIL COULD NOT BE TAKEN OUT DESPITE INTENSIVE EFFORTS. THE NAIL BOTHERED THE PATIENT AFTER 6 1/2 YEARS AND HE WANTED TO HAVE IT REMOVED. THE NAIL COULD NOT BE REMOVED DURING THE FOUR-HOUR SURGERY, WHICH UPSET THE PATIENT VERY MUCH. THE CUSTOMER SUSPECTS THAT THE NAIL BENT IN THE LOWER PART AND THEREFORE COULD NOT BE REMOVED."

    Patient problems: Discomfort

    MAUDE report 13737018 ↗

Other ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices

All ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page