Skip to content

NA 1896-5060SRecalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Locking Screw, Fully Threaded · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540202536), received between May 29, 2018 and Sep 4, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Fracture2
  • Biocompatibility1
  • Inaccurate Information1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant2
  • Injury2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Implant Pain1
  • No Code Available1
  • Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 4, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AS REPORTED: "DISTAL LOCKING SCREW BACKED OUT FROM PATIENT GAMMA3 NAIL. ORIGINAL CASE WAS ON (B)(6) 2025, REVISION WAS ON (B)(6) 2025. SURGEON THEORIZES IT WAS BECAUSE HE HAMMERED THE SCREW IN. REVISION SURGERY. HAD TO UNDERGO SECOND SURGERY TO REVISE SCREW."

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22962092 ↗
  • InjuryApr 5, 2024Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT "PATIENT PRESENTING WITH CHRONIC GENERALIZED URTICARIA SINCE NOVEMBER 2022 AND AFTER THE INSTALLATION OF OSTEOSYNTHESIS MATERIAL. "

    Patient problems: Urticaria

    MAUDE report 19051014 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 4, 2022Inaccurate Information; Inaccurate Information

    STRYKER REP REPORTED THAT SCREWS MEASURING SHORTER THAN THE DESCRIBED LENGTH. SCREW WAS IMPLANTED AND THEN REMOVED DUE TO BEING TO SHORT. A DIFFERENT SCREW WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS DELAYED BY 15 MIN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13156239 ↗
  • InjuryJul 31, 2020Fracture; Fracture

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE GAMMA NAIL BROKE REQUIRING REVISION. LOCKING SCREWS ALSO BROKE. INITIAL IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2020. REVISION SURGERY WAS UNDERTAKEN ON (B)(6) 2020. MOBILISATION INSTRUCTIONS: MOBILISATION AS TOLERATED. PATIENT MOBILISED WELL WITH STICK AFTER BEING DISCHARGED FROM PRIMARY OP. USES STICK SOMETIMES WHEN OUTSIDE BUT DOES NOT USE STICK INDOORS. NO TRAUMA.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Implant Pain; Injury; Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture; Pain

    MAUDE report 10351249 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2020Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT FEMUR WAS REVISED DUE TO THE NAIL BREAKING AT THE JUNCTION OF THE LAG SCREW, WHICH THEN LED TO TWO DISTAL SCREWS BREAKING. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Injury

    MAUDE report 10329683 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 14, 2020Break; Break

    AS REPORTED: "THE LOCKING SCREW WAS UNABLE TO BE INSERTED. THE DRILL DIAMETER WAS ALSO CHECKED AND DIGGING THE TARGET SITE AGAIN, BUT IT WAS STILL UNABLE TO BE INSERTED. SINCE IT WAS FORCEFULLY ATTEMPTED TO INSERT, THE SCREW WAS SHAPED (BROKEN). THE SCREW WAS THEN REPLACED WITH NEW ONE BUT THE SAME EVENT OCCURRED. THE SURGEON STATED THAT THE EVENT OCCURRED DUE TO BONE QUALITY (HARD BONE)."

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9960738 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 14, 2020Break; Break

    AS REPORTED: "THE LOCKING SCREW WAS UNABLE TO BE INSERTED. THE DRILL DIAMETER WAS ALSO CHECKED AND DIGGING THE TARGET SITE AGAIN, BUT IT WAS STILL UNABLE TO BE INSERTED. SINCE IT WAS FORCEFULLY ATTEMPTED TO INSERT, THE SCREW WAS SHAPED (BROKEN). THE SCREW WAS THEN REPLACED WITH NEW ONE BUT THE SAME EVENT OCCURRED. THE SURGEON STATED THAT THE EVENT OCCURRED DUE TO BONE QUALITY (HARD BONE)."

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9960715 ↗
  • InjuryMay 29, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S RIGHT TIBIA WAS REVISED AFTER PATIENT WALKED ON THE ROD AND DISPLACED IT. REP REPORTED THAT HE HAS NO ACCESS TO ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DUE TO NOT BEING ALLOWED ACCESS TO THE HOSPITAL'S PASSWORD-PROTECTED SYSTEMS. REP REPORTED THAT THE NAIL AND 5 SCREWS (3 PROXIMAL, 2 DISTAL) WERE EXPLANTED. HOSPITAL IMPLANT SHEET SHOWS A NAIL AND 6 SCREWS. ADDITIONAL INFO RECEIVED FROM REP'S EMAIL: THERE WAS A SCREW EXCHANGE FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO LENGTH. ONLY 5 SCREWS WERE IMPLANTED. IN INITIAL SURGERY, A 6TH SCREW WAS USED BUT IMMEDIATELY TAKEN OUT. HE DOES NOT KNOW WHICH SCREWS WERE USED AND WHICH ONE WAS NOT USED. THE DISTAL TIBIA DISPLACED NOT THE TIBIAL ROD. ADDITIONAL INFO RECEIVED FROM PHONE CALL WITH REP: REVISION NEEDED BECAUSE "PATIENT WALKED ON LEG WHEN SHOULDN'T HAVE" AND THE BONE MOVED. SURGEON FELT THAT PLATES GAVE A BETTER REDUCTION SO HE SWITCHED FROM THE NAILING SYSTEM TO PLATING.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7551262 ↗

Other ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices

All ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page