NA 6003-010-000Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG · FEMORAL TRACKER · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540246011), received between Feb 15, 2017 and Oct 12, 2020 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Disassembly” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Disassembly4
- Break2
- Computer Software Problem1
- Imprecision1
Patient problems
- No Patient Involvement4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 12, 2020Computer Software Problem; Imprecision; Computer Software Problem; Imprecision
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE AT THE USER FACILITY WHEN ADJUSTING THE JIG OF THE DEVICE DURING BONE PLACEMENT, THE SOFTWARE SHOWED AN INACCURACY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY; NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10665312 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SET UP, THE CAP BROKE OFF; THIS POSES THE RISK OF A SMALL COMPONENT BEING LOST IN THE SURGICAL SITE. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING SETUP AT THE USER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8623739 ↗MalfunctionOct 2, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE BATTERY COMPARTMENT WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7925728 ↗MalfunctionJun 6, 2017Disassembly; Disassembly
DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE CONDUCTED AT THE USER FACILITY A PIECE O THE DEVICE DISASSEMBLED. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT OR PROCEDURAL DELAYS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT BY THE INITIAL REPORTER.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6614842 ↗MalfunctionMar 14, 2017Disassembly; Disassembly
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SERVICE RECEIVING PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY THE LED LENS OF THE DEVICE WAS IDENTIFIED AS BROKEN OFF. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT OR PROCEDURAL DELAYS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT AS THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING THE EVALUATION PROCESS.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6404777 ↗MalfunctionMar 3, 2017Disassembly; Disassembly
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY THE LED LENS OF THE DEVICE WAS IDENTIFIED AS BROKEN OFF. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT OR PROCEDURAL DELAYS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT AS THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING THE EVALUATION PROCESS.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6375756 ↗MalfunctionFeb 15, 2017Disassembly; Disassembly
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY THE LENS OF THE DEVICE WAS IDENTIFIED TO HAVE BROKEN OFF. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT OR PROCEDURAL DELAYS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT AS IT WAS IDENTIFIED DURING SERVICE.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6331416 ↗
Other Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument devices
- REAL INTELLIGENCE ROB10024Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument1 recall924 reports
- NA 209063Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument2 recalls602 reports
- RESTORIS, RIO 212760Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument605 reports
- REAL INTELLIGENCE ROB10013Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument1 recall528 reports
- VELYS 4515-70-105Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument578 reports
- VELYS 4515-70-106Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument564 reports
- NA 209999Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument522 reports
- Mazor X System TPL0059-06Mazor Robotics Ltd · Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument2 recalls2 deaths392 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page