NA 6003-011-000Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG · POINTER, KNEE NAVIGATION · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540246028), received between Feb 16, 2017 and Apr 22, 2026 — classified as 10 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Disassembly” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Disassembly5
- Break3
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Fracture1
- Material Fragmentation1
Patient problems
- No Patient Involvement7
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 22, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
THIS RECORD IS A CONSOLIDATION OF RECORDS SUMMARIZED AS A PART OF THE FDA VOLUNTARY MALFUNCTION SUMMARY REPORTING PROGRAM. EVENTS OCCURRED BETWEEN JANUARY 1 ¿ MARCH 31 2026. THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES 1 EVENT FOR THE FAILURE: DETACHMENT OF DEVICE OR DEVICE COMPONENT. - 1 EVENT HAD NO HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OR IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24954346 ↗MalfunctionNov 27, 2019Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Fracture; Material Fragmentation
THE CUSTOMER OBSERVED THAT A RUBBER GASKET WAS MISSING ON THE DEVICE WHEN INSPECTED BEFORE A PROCEDURE. THE GASKET BEING DETACHED POSES THE RISK OF A SMALL COMPONENT BEING LOST IN THE SURGICAL SITE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES; THERE WERE NO SIGNIFICANT PROCEDURE DELAYS; THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9386332 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2019Break; Break
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS OBSERVED TO BE BROKEN PRIOR TO RE-PROCESSING; THIS POSES THE RISK OF A SMALL COMPONENT BEING LOST IN THE SURGICAL SITE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES; THERE WERE NO SIGNIFICANT PROCEDURE DELAYS; THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8949769 ↗MalfunctionJan 15, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AT THE USER FACILITY THE TIP BROKE OFF. ATTEMPTS ARE BEING MADE TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE USER FACILITY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8250716 ↗MalfunctionDec 12, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED DURING A SERVICE EVALUATION THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS FOUND BROKEN OFF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR PROCEDURAL DELAYS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8156823 ↗MalfunctionApr 21, 2017Disassembly; Disassembly
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS IDENTIFIED AS BROKEN OFF. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT OR PROCEDURAL DELAYS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT AS THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING THE EVALUATION PROCESS.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6510579 ↗MalfunctionApr 13, 2017Disassembly; Disassembly
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TESTING CONDUCTED AT THE USER FACILITY THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN OFF. ALTHOUGH REQUESTED, THE USER FACILITY WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER DETAILS SURROUNDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6491185 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2017Disassembly; Disassembly
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS IDENTIFIED AS BROKEN OFF. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT OR PROCEDURAL DELAYS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT AS THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING THE EVALUATION PROCESS.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6452700 ↗MalfunctionMar 3, 2017Disassembly; Disassembly
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY THE LED LENS OF THE DEVICE WAS IDENTIFIED AS BROKEN OFF. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT OR PROCEDURAL DELAYS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT AS THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING THE EVALUATION PROCESS.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6375757 ↗MalfunctionFeb 16, 2017Disassembly; Disassembly
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TESTING CONDUCTED AT THE USER FACILITY THE LED COVER FELL OFF. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT OR PROCEDURAL DELAYS WERE REPORTED WITH THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6335107 ↗
Other Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument devices
- REAL INTELLIGENCE ROB10024Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument1 recall924 reports
- NA 209063Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument2 recalls602 reports
- RESTORIS, RIO 212760Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument605 reports
- REAL INTELLIGENCE ROB10013Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument1 recall528 reports
- VELYS 4515-70-105Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument578 reports
- VELYS 4515-70-106Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument564 reports
- NA 209999Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument522 reports
- Mazor X System TPL0059-06Mazor Robotics Ltd · Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument2 recalls2 deaths392 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page