Skip to content

NA 5820066012Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · 1.2mm Cross-Cut Fissure · Class 1

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540362346), received between May 1, 2019 and Apr 4, 2023 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Sep 5, 2024Open, Classified

    May exhibit endotoxin levels greater than 2.15 EU/device, fever and inflammation may occur from endotoxin exposure and meningitis may only occur if there is contact with cerebrospinal fluid and thus, neurosurgical/spinal procedures may be considered a population at greatest risk.

    Z-0063-2025 · Root cause: Process control · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture3
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA HEALTH CANADA REPORT REFERENCE #(B)(4), THAT DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE, THE DRILL BIT BROKE AT THE TIP. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16672544 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 9, 2020Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BSSO & LEFORT PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE BUR BROKE. THE FRAGMENT WAS IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AND NO DELAYS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10979348 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 9, 2020Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BSSO & LEFORT PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE BUR BROKE. THE FRAGMENT WAS IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AND NO DELAYS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10979289 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 1, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO SURGERY, THE BUR BROKE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THERE WERE NO DELAYS AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8568819 ↗

Other Bur, Surgical, General & Plastic Surgery devices

All Bur, Surgical, General & Plastic Surgery devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.