OASYS 48551070Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · TRANSVERSE CONNECTOR · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 14
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 14 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540371607), received between Mar 29, 2016 and Nov 7, 2018 — classified as 14 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (14 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break14
- Fracture10
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Detachment Of Device Component2
- Material Integrity Problem2
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient14
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 14 most recent of 14 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 7, 2018Fracture; Break; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TRANSVERSE CONNECTOR BROKE DURING TIGHTENING. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON WAS USING THE FINAL TIGHTENER WITHOUT THE USE OF THE ANTI-TORQUE. SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8048498 ↗MalfunctionSep 5, 2018Break; Fracture; Fracture
WHEN TIGHTENING THE TRANSVERSE CONNECTOR WITH TORQUE WRENCH, THE CONNECTOR BROKE. THE TRANSVERSE CONNECTOR WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER SAME NEW ONE. NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7848016 ↗MalfunctionMay 29, 2018Break; Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TRANSVERSE CONNECTOR BROKE AT THE TIME OF FINAL TIGHTENING OF BLOCKER WITH TORQUE WRENCH. BLOCKER WAS IN INSIDE OF TRANSVERSE HEAD. THE SURGEON CHANGED IT WITH A NEW ONE AND SURGERY SUCCEEDED. THERE ARE NO REPORTS OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7551260 ↗MalfunctionMay 1, 2018Fracture; Break; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE TRANSVERSE CONNECTOR WAS FINAL TIGHTENED, IT WAS BROKEN. THE CONNECTOR WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE AND THE OPERATION WAS CONTINUED. THERE ARE NO REPORTS OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7474971 ↗MalfunctionOct 31, 2017Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; WHEN FINAL TIGHTENING THE TRANSVERSE CONNECTOR, THE BOTTOM WHERE IT CONNECTS TO THE ROD SNAPPED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6990915 ↗MalfunctionApr 12, 2017Break; Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TRANSVERSE CONNECTOR WAS BROKEN DURING FINAL TIGHTENING AND THEY WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE SURGEON CHANGED IT WITH THE NEW ONE AND THE SURGERY SUCCEEDED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6485502 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2017Break; Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; DURING TIGHTENING OF TRANSVERSE CROSS CONNECTOR BOTTOM TABS BROKE OFF. THIS HAPPENED 8-10 TIMES WITH ALL SIZES OF CROSS CONNECTORS. PROPER TECHNIQUE WAS FOLLOW DURING TIGHTENED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6400160 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2017Break; Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; DURING TIGHTENING OF TRANSVERSE CROSS CONNECTOR BOTTOM TABS BROKE OFF. THIS HAPPENED 8-10 TIMES WITH ALL SIZES OF OF CROSS CONNECTORS. PROPER TECHNIQUE WAS FOLLOW DURING TIGHTENED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6399649 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2017Break; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; DURING TIGHTENING OF TRANSVERSE CROSS CONNECTOR BOTTOM TABS BROKE OFF. THIS HAPPENED 8-10 TIMES WITH ALL SIZES OF CROSS CONNECTORS. PROPER TECHNIQUE WAS FOLLOW DURING TIGHTENED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6399648 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2017Break; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; DURING TIGHTENING OF TRANSVERSE CROSS CONNECTOR BOTTOM TABS BROKE OFF. THIS HAPPENED 8-10 TIMES WITH ALL SIZES OF CROSS CONNECTORS. PROPER TECHNIQUE WAS FOLLOW DURING TIGHTENED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6399643 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2017Break; Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; DURING TIGHTENING OF TRANSVERSE CROSS CONNECTOR BOTTOM TABS BROKE OFF. THIS HAPPENED 8-10 TIMES WITH ALL SIZES OF CROSS CONNECTORS. PROPER TECHNIQUE WAS FOLLOW DURING TIGHTENED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6399642 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2017Break; Detachment Of Device Component; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; DURING TIGHTENING OF TRANSVERSE CROSS CONNECTOR, BOTTOM TABS BROKE OFF. THIS HAPPENED 8-10 TIMES WITH ALL SIZES OF CROSS CONNECTORS. PROPER TECHNIQUE WAS FOLLOW DURING TIGHTENED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6399640 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2017Break; Detachment Of Device Component; Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; DURING TIGHTENING OF TRANSVERSE CROSS CONNECTOR BOTTOM TABS BROKE OFF. THIS HAPPENED 8-10 TIMES WITH ALL SIZES OF CROSS CONNECTORS. PROPER TECHNIQUE WAS FOLLOW DURING TIGHTENED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6399639 ↗MalfunctionMar 29, 2016Fracture; Break; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGERY, A PART OF A CONNECTOR BROKE WHEN THE SURGEON TIGHTEN IT FINALLY. THE SURGEON USED OTHER ONE AND FINISHED THE SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5532376 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices
- EXPEDIUM 179702000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL439 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL227 reports
- XIA 3 48230000Stryker Corporation · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL193 reports
- VIPER 186715000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL1 death167 reports
- NA 04.614.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL80 reports
- EXPEDIUM VIPER 196789480Depuy Spine, LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- NA 04.615.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- Arsenal Deformity Spinal Fixation System 47127Alphatec Spine, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL66 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.