OASYS 48552430Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · POLYAXIAL SCREW · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540371836), received between May 10, 2016 and Mar 16, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Fracture1
- Mechanical Jam1
- Mechanical Problem1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Spinal Cord Injury1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 16, 2023Fracture; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Fracture; Detachment of Device or Device Component
A COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT THE HEAD OF AN OASYS POLYAXIAL SCREW FRACTURED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH AN UNKNOWN SURGICAL DELAY AND THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED SPINAL CORD CONTUSION, REQUIRING DURA REPAIR AND FURTHER HOSPITALIZATION.
Patient problems: Spinal Cord Injury
MAUDE report 16554371 ↗MalfunctionDec 30, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN OASYS POLYAXIAL SCREW NON BIASED TULIP DISENGAGED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE TULIP CAME OUT SEPARATELY FROM THE SHAFT, SO THE SCREW WAS TAKEN OUT AND REPLACED AFTER GREAT DIFFICULTY. THE LOCKING CAPS AND THE ROD HAD TO BE TAKEN OUT, WHICH INCREASED THE SURGERY TIME BY AN HOUR.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9531526 ↗MalfunctionMay 10, 2016Mechanical Problem; Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Jam
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW CAN NOT BE SCREWED INTO,CHANGE ANOTHER NEW ONE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5645145 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices
- EXPEDIUM 179702000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL439 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL227 reports
- XIA 3 48230000Stryker Corporation · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL193 reports
- VIPER 186715000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL1 death167 reports
- NA 04.614.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL80 reports
- EXPEDIUM VIPER 196789480Depuy Spine, LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- NA 04.615.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- Arsenal Deformity Spinal Fixation System 47127Alphatec Spine, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL66 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.