GAMMA 3525-0340SRecalls & reported problems
Stryker GmbH · Long Nail Kit R1.5, Ti, LEFT · Class 2 · Implant
All models of GAMMA (249)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540375735), received between Feb 27, 2020 and Oct 4, 2023 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture3
- Break2
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant3
- Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture3
- Discomfort1
- Injury1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 4, 2023Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
AS REPORTED: "AFTER THE INITIAL SURGERY, THE FRACTURE BECAME PSEUDOARTICULAR AND THE NAIL EVENTUALLY BROKE OFF. AFTER REMOVAL, IT WAS REPLACED WITH THA."
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 17867772 ↗InjuryNov 19, 2020Fracture; Fracture
AS REPORTED; "ORIF FOR TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR. THE NAIL BROKE BECAUSE THE BONES DID NOT HEAL."
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 10870188 ↗InjuryFeb 27, 2020Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
AS REPORTED: "PATIENT WHO HAD LEFT LONG GAMMA OPERATION ON (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT FELT UNCOMFORTABLE AT THE SITE OF THE SURGERY, AND ON (B)(6) 2020, THE NAIL BREAK WAS CONFIRMED AT THE LAG SCREW INSERTION SITE. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT A LOAD WAS APPLIED WHEN USING THE STEP DRILL. AS A RESULT, THE NON-UNION OCCURRED. THE SIDE REDUCTION MAY HAVE BEEN SOMEWHAT POOR, OR THE PATIENT HAVE BEEN DRINKING SO MUCH THAT THIS MAY HAVE HAD AN EFFECT. A REVISION WAS MADE ON (B)(6)."
Patient problems: Discomfort; Failure of Implant; Injury; Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture; Pain
MAUDE report 9766334 ↗
Other ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices
- NA 03.033.001Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES265 reports
- GAMMA 3125-1180SStryker GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES249 reports
- NA 03.037.026Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES225 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-075Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls2 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-045Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- TRIGEN 71674067Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES201 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-050Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSB5-075Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page