Skip to content

OASYS 48552326Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · POLYAXIAL SCREW · Class 2 · Implant

All models of OASYS (60)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540380524), received between Mar 3, 2016 and Mar 23, 2021 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Injury1
  • No Code Available1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE TULIPS OF TWO OASYS SCREWS, PLACED AT LEFT-SIDE C3 AND C4, BECAME DISENGAGED DURING EXPLANT SURGERY. THE DEVICES HAD BEEN IMPLANTED FOR APPROXIMATELY 10 YEARS AND WERE BEING REMOVED AS PART OF A PROCEDURE TO REPLACE THE OLDER DEVICES AND EXTEND THE CONSTRUCT. THE PHYSICIAN COULD NOT REMOVE THE SCREW SHAFTS AND ELECTED TO LEAVE THEM IMPLANTED AND BEGIN THE NEW, EXTENDED CONSTRUCT AT C5. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE SCREW IMPLANTED AT C4.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11556106 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE TULIPS OF TWO OASYS SCREWS, PLACED AT LEFT-SIDE C3 AND C4, BECAME DISENGAGED DURING EXPLANT SURGERY. THE DEVICES HAD BEEN IMPLANTED FOR APPROXIMATELY 10 YEARS AND WERE BEING REMOVED AS PART OF A PROCEDURE TO REPLACE THE OLDER DEVICES AND EXTEND THE CONSTRUCT. THE PHYSICIAN COULD NOT REMOVE THE SCREW SHAFTS AND ELECTED TO LEAVE THEM IMPLANTED AND BEGIN THE NEW, EXTENDED CONSTRUCT AT C5. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE SCREW IMPLANTED AT C3.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11556102 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    STRYKER REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING REMOVAL SURGERY, AN OASYS POLYAXIAL SCREW HEAD CAME OFF FROM MAIN SCREW. NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9759456 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 3, 2016Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Loose or Intermittent Connection; Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON FOUND THE LOOSENING OF THE BLOCKER UPON X-RAY IMAGES. THEREFORE, THE SURGEON IS MONITORING THE PATIENT, AND IS PLANNING REVISION SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Injury; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 5478038 ↗

Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices

All APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page