T2 1897-6095SRecalls & reported problems
Stryker GmbH · Lag Screw, Recon · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540384799), received between Aug 14, 2018 and Mar 23, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
- Break1
- Fracture1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
- Migration1
Patient problems
- No Code Available2
- Perforation2
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Hip Fracture1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 23, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AS REPORTED: "THE LAG SCREW OF THE T2ALPHAGT WAS NOT SEATED WITHIN THE SCREW HOLE, RESULTING IN FEMORAL SHORTENING WHEN THE PATIENT APPLIED WEIGHT POSTOPERATIVELY, CAUSING THE PROXIMAL END OF THE NAIL TO PROTRUDE FROM THE FEMUR."
Patient problems: Perforation
MAUDE report 24670642 ↗InjurySep 8, 2023Migration; Migration
AS REPORTED: "T2ALPHAGT WAS USED IN THE RECOM MODE ON (B)(6) 2023 FOR A SUBTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE OF THE FEMUR . AFTER SURGERY, DR CONFIRMED CUTOUT BY BOTH LAG SCREWS AT FEMORAL HEAD WHEN POSTOPERATIVE FOLLOW-UP. REMOVAL SURGERY WAS DONE AT (B)(6) 2023. THE DR FELT THAT THE SET SCREWS SEEMED TO BE LOOSELY FASTENED TO THE LAG SCREWS DURING REMOVAL SURGERY."
Patient problems: Hip Fracture; Perforation
MAUDE report 17714474 ↗MalfunctionDec 19, 2022Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
AS REPORTED: "DURING SURGERY THE SURGEON TOOK AN X RAY AND IT SHOWED THE SCREW HAD BROKE. SURGEON USED ONE LAG SCREW IN T2 ALPHA RECON MODE, THEN LEFT THE HEAD OF THE BROKEN SCREW IN THE NAIL THREADS AS WAS UNABLE TO REMOVE AND FINISHED THE CASE BY USING ONE OF THE ANTEGRADE MODE SCREW HOLE OPTIONS.". THERE WAS A 15 MINUTE DELAY TO THE SURGERY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 16010174 ↗InjuryAug 14, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE MANUFACTURER BECAME AWARE OF ADVERSE EVENTS FROM THE NORWEGIAN HIP FRACTURE REGISTER. THE TITLE OF THIS REPORT IS ¿T2 RECON IN THE NORWEGIAN HIP FRACTURE REGISTER¿ WHICH IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE T2 RECON NAILING SYSTEM, WITHIN THAT REPORT, POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS/ ADVERSE EVENTS WERE REPORTED, WHICH OCCURRED BETWEEN 2009 AND 2017. A REVIEW OF THE COMPLAINT HANDLING DATABASE REVEALED THAT THE EVENTS HAVE NOT BEEN REPORTED PREVIOUSLY TO STRYKER, THEREFORE 13 EVENTS WERE INITIATED RETROSPECTIVELY FOR DIFFERENT ADVERSE EVENTS MENTIONED IN THE REPORT. THIS PRODUCT INQUIRY ADDRESSES REVISION SURGERY DUE TO SEQUEL AFTER HIP FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7780076 ↗InjuryAug 14, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE MANUFACTURER BECAME AWARE OF ADVERSE EVENTS FROM THE (B)(6) HIP FRACTURE REGISTER. THE TITLE OF THIS REPORT IS ¿T2 RECON IN THE (B)(6) HIP FRACTURE REGISTER¿ WHICH IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE T2 RECON NAILING SYSTEM, WITHIN THAT REPORT, POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS/ ADVERSE EVENTS WERE REPORTED, WHICH OCCURRED BETWEEN 2009 AND 2017. A REVIEW OF THE COMPLAINT HANDLING DATABASE REVEALED THAT THE EVENTS HAVE NOT BEEN REPORTED PREVIOUSLY TO STRYKER, THEREFORE 13 EVENTS WERE INITIATED RETROSPECTIVELY FOR DIFFERENT ADVERSE EVENTS MENTIONED IN THE REPORT. THIS PRODUCT INQUIRY ADDRESSES REVISION SURGERY DUE TO OSTEOSYNTHESIS FAILURE. A RE-OSTEOSYNTHESIS HAS BEEN PERFORMED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7779990 ↗
Other ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices
- NA 03.033.001Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES265 reports
- GAMMA 3125-1180SStryker GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES249 reports
- NA 03.037.026Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES225 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-075Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls2 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-045Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-050Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- TRIGEN 71674067Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES201 reports
- PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSB5-040Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page