TECHTONIX 48202234Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · 22-34 mm PLATE SHORT MEDIUM · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04546540443144), received between Oct 24, 2016 and Oct 24, 2016 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Difficult to Remove1
Patient problems
- Injury1
- No Code Available1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 24, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Difficult to Remove; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; THERE IS A PATIENT COMPLAINT AND REQUESTED US TO CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. PATIENT (B)(6) IS CONTACTED BY RAQA MANAGER AND AREA MANAGER TURKEY AND THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS RECEIVED; PATIENT HAD THE FIRST SURGERY IN 2012 PLATES.THE REASON OF THE FIRST SURGERY WAS DISC DEGENERATION & STENOSIS. HE HAD A SHORT OPERATION WITH LOCAL ANESTHESIA IN 2013 BECAUSE OF HIS PAINS, IN 2015, HE NEEDED TO HAVE ANOTHER SURGERY. THE SURGERY TOOK 4.5 HOURS AND THE DOCTOR INFORMED THE PATIENT THAT THEY OPENED HIM BUT COULD NOT DO ANYTHING BECAUSE THEY COULDN¿T GET THE IMPLANTS OUT. HE TRIED TO REMOVE THE IMPLANTS WITH OTHER INSTRUMENT SET, BUT COULD NOT MANAGE. DOCTOR ALSO TOLD TO THE PATIENT THAT, THEY TRIED TO REACH THE DISTRIBUTOR AND THE DISTRIBUTOR TOLD THAT THESE PRODUCTS WERE OUT OF MARKET. ( DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT WAS TERMINATED BY DEC 2012.) IMPLANTS IN THE PATIENT WERE DAMAGED DURING THIS SURGERY. DOCTOR ALSO TOLD THE PATIENT THAT, EVEN IF HE CAN FIND THE INSTRUMENTS, HE CAN¿T PERFORM THE SURGERY. PATIENT¿S 3RD SURGERY WAS DONE AND SURGEON ONLY COULD LOOSENED HIS NERVES. THE PATIENT IS SUFFERING NOW AND THE SURGEONS TOLD HIM THAT HE CAN¿T BEAR THE 4TH SURGERY, IF HE
Patient problems: Injury; No Code Available; Pain
MAUDE report 6052680 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices
- EXPEDIUM 179702000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL439 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL227 reports
- XIA 3 48230000Stryker Corporation · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL193 reports
- VIPER 186715000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL1 death167 reports
- NA 04.614.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL80 reports
- EXPEDIUM VIPER 196789480Depuy Spine, LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- NA 04.615.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- Arsenal Deformity Spinal Fixation System 47127Alphatec Spine, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL66 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.