NA 6003-012-000Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG · ORTHO GRIP KNEE POINTER · Class 2
Quick summary
This Stryker Ortho Grip Knee Pointer is a hand-held surgical pointer used to help position the knee during orthopedic surgery. The 53 reports filed since March 2017 mostly describe the tip breaking off or the instrument fracturing or coming apart, along with a few cases of inaccurate measurement. No deaths and no injuries were reported, and most events either happened during testing at the manufacturer's facility or reached the patient without harm. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 53
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 53 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540470331), received between Mar 14, 2017 and Dec 23, 2025 — classified as 53 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (23 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break23
- Fracture18
- Disassembly7
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress4
- Incorrect Measurement4
- Imprecision2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient26
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions15
- No Patient Involvement12
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 53 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 23, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FROM THE USER FACILITY AND LABELLED "FOR REPAIR,' WITH NO FURTHER INFORMATION. AFTER SERVICE ANALYSIS OF THE DEVICE, A BROKEN TIP WAS DISCOVERED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED FROM THE USER FACILITY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23878385 ↗MalfunctionOct 28, 2025Incorrect Measurement; Incorrect Measurement
MalfunctionApr 21, 2025Incorrect Measurement; Incorrect Measurement
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES 2 MALFUNCTION EVENTS IN WHICH THE DEVICE REPORTEDLY HAD AN INCORRECT MEASUREMENT. - 1 EVENT HAD THE PROBLEM IDENTIFIED BEFORE CLINICAL USE/EXPOSURE; THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. - 1 EVENT HAD PATIENT INVOLVEMENT; NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21876701 ↗MalfunctionJan 22, 2025Incorrect Measurement; Incorrect Measurement
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES 1 MALFUNCTION EVENT IN WHICH THE DEVICE REPORTEDLY HAD AN INCORRECT MEASUREMENT. 1 EVENT HAD PATIENT INVOLVEMENT: NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21207641 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2021Fracture; Fracture
DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING TESTING AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12377215 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2021Fracture; Fracture
DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING TESTING AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11837281 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2021Fracture; Fracture
DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING TESTING AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11837137 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2021Fracture; Fracture
DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING TESTING AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11837125 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2021Fracture; Fracture
DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING TESTING AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11836484 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2021Fracture; Fracture
DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING TESTING AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11832743 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2021Fracture; Fracture
DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING TESTING AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11778585 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2021Fracture; Fracture
DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING TESTING AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11778572 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2021Fracture; Fracture
DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING TESTING AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11778567 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2021Fracture; Fracture
DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING TESTING AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11778565 ↗MalfunctionNov 3, 2020Imprecision; Imprecision
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AT THE USER FACILITY THE DEVICE'S ACCURACY WAS OFF. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY; NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10779797 ↗MalfunctionOct 29, 2020Imprecision; Incorrect Measurement; Imprecision; Incorrect Measurement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AT THE USER FACILITY THE DEVICE'S ACCURACY WAS OFF. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY; NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10758075 ↗MalfunctionOct 8, 2019Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN; THIS POSES THE RISK OF A SMALL COMPONENT BEING LOST IN THE SURGICAL SITE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES; THERE WERE NO SIGNIFICANT PROCEDURE DELAYS; THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9167055 ↗MalfunctionSep 3, 2019Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING TESTING, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE DEVICE'S TIP WAS BENT AND WAS BROKEN OFF; THIS POSES THE RISK OF A SMALL COMPONENT BEING LOST IN THE SURGICAL SITE. . NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING TESTING AT THE USER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8956758 ↗MalfunctionAug 28, 2019Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER A SURGICAL PROCEDURE AT THE USER FACILITY THE TIP WAS BENT. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES; THERE WERE NO SIGNIFICANT PROCEDURE DELAYS; THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8941321 ↗MalfunctionJun 27, 2019Break; Break
DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP WAS BROKEN OFF; THIS POSES THE RISK OF A SMALL COMPONENT BEING LOST IN THE SURGICAL SITE. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING A SERVICE EVALUATION AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8741570 ↗MalfunctionJun 20, 2019Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE TIP BROKE OFF PRIOR TO USE; THIS POSES THE RISK OF A SMALL COMPONENT BEING LOST IN THE SURGICAL SITE. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED PRIOR TO USE AT THE USER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8716512 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2019Break; Break
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE TIP BROKE OFF POSING THE RISK OF A SMALL COMPONENT BEING LOST IN THE SURGICAL SITE. ALTHOUGH REQUESTED, NO INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE REGARDING HOW THE REPORTED EVENT WAS NOTICED OR IF THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, NO DELAY, NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8687841 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8514800 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8514799 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS CONDUCTED AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP WAS BROKEN OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THIS EVENT. AS THIS EVENT OCCURRED DURING THE SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS AT THE MANUFACTURER FACILITY, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO DELAY TO A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8514797 ↗
Other Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument devices
- REAL INTELLIGENCE ROB10024Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument1 recall924 reports
- NA 209063Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument2 recalls602 reports
- RESTORIS, RIO 212760Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument605 reports
- REAL INTELLIGENCE ROB10013Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument1 recall528 reports
- VELYS 4515-70-105Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument578 reports
- VELYS 4515-70-106Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument564 reports
- NA 209999Mako Surgical Corp. · Orthopedic stereotaxic instrument522 reports
- Mazor X System TPL0059-06Mazor Robotics Ltd · Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument2 recalls2 deaths392 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.