XIA 3 48236053Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · 53-73 mm MULTI AXIAL CROSS CONNECTOR · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540560889), received between Aug 9, 2016 and Dec 10, 2021 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture3
- Break2
- Material Integrity Problem1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 10, 2021Fracture; Fracture
THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A XIA CONSTRUCT ON (B)(6) 2017. ON (B)(6) 2018, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TULIP OF A XIA 3 POLYAXIAL SCREW DISENGAGED AND THE RIGHT SIDE XIA II ROD FRACTURED AFTER THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A FALL. ON (B)(6) 2021, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD BEEN REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021 TO ADDRESS THE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED DISENGAGED SCREW AND FRACTURED ROD, AS WELL AS A SECOND ROD FRACTURE (ON THE LEFT SIDE). DURING REVISION SURGERY, A XIA 3 POLYAXIAL SCREW WAS NOTED TO BE LOOSE AND TWO XIA 3 MULTIAXIAL CROSSLINKS WERE REMOVED. EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICES IDENTIFIED THAT BOTH CROSSLINKS WERE FRACTURED. THIS RECORD CAPTURES THE FIRST OF TWO XIA 3 MULTIAXIAL CROSSLINKS REMOVED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12977803 ↗MalfunctionJun 27, 2018Break; Fracture; Fracture
A PLIF SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2010 RESULTED IN AN ADJACENT VERTEBRAL DISORDER. AS A RESULT, REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED ON (B)(6) 2018 DURING WHICH THE NUT ON THE CROSSLINK BROKE WHILE TIGHTENING IT WITH THE NUT DRIVER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH AN ALTERNATE CROSSLINK. NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT WERE REPORTED DURING REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7644313 ↗MalfunctionAug 9, 2016Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED; DURING SURGERY, WHEN THE SURGEON PLACED THE CONNECTOR AND TIGHTENED THE CENTRAL NUT THE NUT BROKE. THE SURGEON USED A SPARE ONE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5858358 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices
- EXPEDIUM 179702000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL439 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL227 reports
- XIA 3 48230000Stryker Corporation · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL193 reports
- VIPER 186715000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL1 death167 reports
- NA 04.614.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL80 reports
- EXPEDIUM VIPER 196789480Depuy Spine, LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- NA 04.615.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- Arsenal Deformity Spinal Fixation System 47127Alphatec Spine, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL66 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.