Skip to content

XIA 3 482316540Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · POLYAXIAL SCREW · Class 2 · Implant

All models of XIA 3 (93)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
13
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
11
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 13 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540562234), received between Jul 9, 2016 and Jul 24, 2025 — classified as 11 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Biocompatibility” (7 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 2 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Biocompatibility7
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility6
  • Fracture5
  • Break4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • Itching Sensation7
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Injury1
  • No Code Available1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 13 most recent of 13 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 24, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    A COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY APPROXIMATELY SIX MONTHS POST-OPERATIVELY TO ADDRESS TWO FRACTURED XIA 3 POLYAXIAL SCREWS. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE SECOND OF TWO SCREWS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22594597 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    A COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY APPROXIMATELY SIX MONTHS POST-OPERATIVELY TO ADDRESS TWO FRACTURED XIA 3 POLYAXIAL SCREWS. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE FIRST OF TWO SCREWS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22593449 ↗
  • InjuryJun 24, 2019Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PHYSICIAN REPORTED ¿A PATIENT IMPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2017 WITH ¿SCREWS AND ROD¿ HAS DEVELOPED A GENERALIZED PRURITUS THAT DOES NOT DISAPPEAR SINCE THE IMPLANTATION.¿ THE PHYSICIAN SUGGESTS THE PATIENT MAY HAVE AN ALLERGY TO A COMPONENT OF THE DEVICE. DETAILS OF SPECIFIC MEDICAL INTERVENTION HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED AND THE PATIENT HAS CONSULTED WITH A DERMATOLOGIST. THIS RECORD REPRESENTS 3 OF 3 SCREW.

    Patient problems: Itching Sensation

    MAUDE report 8729388 ↗
  • InjuryJun 24, 2019Biocompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Biocompatibility

    PHYSICIAN REPORTED ¿A PATIENT IMPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2017 WITH ¿SCREWS AND ROD¿ HAS DEVELOPED A GENERALIZED PRURITUS THAT DOES NOT DISAPPEAR SINCE THE IMPLANTATION.¿ THE PHYSICIAN SUGGESTS THE PATIENT MAY HAVE AN ALLERGY TO A COMPONENT OF THE DEVICE. DETAILS OF SPECIFIC MEDICAL INTERVENTION HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED AND THE PATIENT HAS CONSULTED WITH A DERMATOLOGIST. THIS RECORD REPRESENTS 2 OF 3 SCREW.

    Patient problems: Itching Sensation

    MAUDE report 8729387 ↗
  • InjuryJun 24, 2019Biocompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Biocompatibility

    PHYSICIAN REPORTED ¿A PATIENT IMPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2017 WITH ¿SCREWS AND ROD¿ HAS DEVELOPED A GENERALIZED PRURITUS THAT DOES NOT DISAPPEAR SINCE THE IMPLANTATION.¿ THE PHYSICIAN SUGGESTS THE PATIENT MAY HAVE AN ALLERGY TO A COMPONENT OF THE DEVICE. DETAILS OF SPECIFIC MEDICAL INTERVENTION HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED AND THE PATIENT HAS CONSULTED WITH A DERMATOLOGIST. THIS RECORD REPRESENTS 1 OF 1 SCREW.

    Patient problems: Itching Sensation

    MAUDE report 8729054 ↗
  • InjuryJun 24, 2019Biocompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Biocompatibility

    PHYSICIAN REPORTED ¿A PATIENT IMPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2017 WITH ¿SCREWS AND ROD¿ HAS DEVELOPED A GENERALIZED PRURITUS THAT DOES NOT DISAPPEAR SINCE THE IMPLANTATION.¿ THE PHYSICIAN SUGGESTS THE PATIENT MAY HAVE AN ALLERGY TO A COMPONENT OF THE DEVICE. DETAILS OF SPECIFIC MEDICAL INTERVENTION HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED AND THE PATIENT HAS CONSULTED WITH A DERMATOLOGIST. THIS RECORD REPRESENTS 3 OF 4 SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Itching Sensation

    MAUDE report 8728990 ↗
  • InjuryJun 24, 2019Biocompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Biocompatibility

    PHYSICIAN REPORTED ¿A PATIENT IMPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2017 WITH ¿SCREWS AND ROD¿ HAS DEVELOPED A GENERALIZED PRURITUS THAT DOES NOT DISAPPEAR SINCE THE IMPLANTATION.¿ THE PHYSICIAN SUGGESTS THE PATIENT MAY HAVE AN ALLERGY TO A COMPONENT OF THE DEVICE. DETAILS OF SPECIFIC MEDICAL INTERVENTION HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED AND THE PATIENT HAS CONSULTED WITH A DERMATOLOGIST. THIS RECORD REPRESENTS 4 OF 4 SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Itching Sensation

    MAUDE report 8728980 ↗
  • InjuryJun 24, 2019Biocompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Biocompatibility

    PHYSICIAN REPORTED ¿A PATIENT IMPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2017 WITH ¿SCREWS AND ROD¿ HAS DEVELOPED A GENERALIZED PRURITUS THAT DOES NOT DISAPPEAR SINCE THE IMPLANTATION.¿ THE PHYSICIAN SUGGESTS THE PATIENT MAY HAVE AN ALLERGY TO A COMPONENT OF THE DEVICE. DETAILS OF SPECIFIC MEDICAL INTERVENTION HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED AND THE PATIENT HAS CONSULTED WITH A DERMATOLOGIST. THIS RECORD REPRESENTS 2 OF 4 SCREW.

    Patient problems: Itching Sensation

    MAUDE report 8728975 ↗
  • InjuryJun 24, 2019Biocompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Biocompatibility

    PHYSICIAN REPORTED A PATIENT IMPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2017 WITH ¿SCREWS AND ROD¿ HAS DEVELOPED A GENERALIZED PRURITUS THAT DOES NOT DISAPPEAR SINCE THE IMPLANTATION. THE PHYSICIAN SUGGESTS THE PATIENT MAY HAVE AN ALLERGY TO A COMPONENT OF THE DEVICE. DETAILS OF SPECIFIC MEDICAL INTERVENTION HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED AND THE PATIENT HAS CONSULTED WITH A DERMATOLOGIST. THIS RECORD REPRESENTS 1 OF 4 SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Itching Sensation

    MAUDE report 8728972 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 19, 2019Break; Fracture; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DURING REVISION SURGERY (TO TREAT ADJACENT INTERVERTEBRAL DISORDER), WHILE REMOVING THE SCREW, THE SCREW WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. THE FRACTURED SCREW WAS REMOVED, AND A NEW SCREW IS INSERTED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT HAVE BEEN REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8431862 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 6, 2018Break; Fracture; Fracture

    IT IS REPORTED THAT DURING A REVISION SURGERY A SCREW BROKE. THE BROKEN SCREW WAS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO PATIENT FACTOR: ADJACENT INTERVERTEBRAL DISORDERS, EXTENSION WAS PERFORMED ON L2 TO S1. NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES HAS BEEN REPORTED DUE TO SCREW BREAKAGE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7572788 ↗
  • InjuryJun 5, 2017Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; THE DOCTOR REPORTED TO SALES REP THAT TWO OUT OF FOUR IMPLANTED SCREWS HAD BEEN FOUND BROKEN AFTER 2 YEARS FROM THE INITIAL SURGERY - (B)(6) 2015. A REVISION SURGERY IS SCHEDULED WITHIN 2 WEEKS.

    Patient problems: Injury; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6613085 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2016Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; REVISION CASE OF A BROKEN SCREW. PATIENT WAS (B)(6). HAD 2 SCREWS IN PATIENT ON THE LEFTSIDE L4-L5. THE SCREW IN L4 BROKE. PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED BUT HAD TO HAVE SURGERY TO TAKE BROKEN PIECE OUT.THE PIECE WILL BE SENT BACK TO YOU. THE DOCTOR LEFT THE SECOND HALF OF THE SCREW IN THE PATIENTS HE SAID IT WOULD BE MORE HARMFUL TO TAKE IT OUT.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 5780593 ↗

Other Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices

All Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page