Skip to content

XIA 3 482318545Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · POLYAXIAL SCREW · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540598592), received between Apr 13, 2016 and Jan 7, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Deformation3
  • Break2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Material Integrity Problem2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Device Slipped1
  • Fracture1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient5
  • Injury1
  • No Code Available1
  • Numbness1
  • Pain1
  • Spinal Column Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 7, 2026Fracture; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    NO NEW INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Spinal Column Injury

    MAUDE report 23999517 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 21, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE ROD WAS INSERTED INTO THE SCREW HEAD WITH A PERSUADER, THE SCREW HEAD CAME OFF THE SCREW SHAFT. THE SCREW AND ROD WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW ONES. THERE WERE NO BROKEN FRAGMENTS. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF HONE HOUR AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7898479 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 17, 2017Material Integrity Problem; Material Deformation; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; 8.5 SCREW SPLAYED OPEN DURING FINAL TIGHTENING

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6720060 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 5, 2017Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem; Device Slipped

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; SCREW HEAD POPPED OFF WHEN FINAL TIGHTENING BLOCKER. REPLACED SCREW WITH ANOTHER 8.5 X 50 SCREW.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6687933 ↗
  • InjuryMay 19, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2017, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SURGERY AND COMPLAINED OF PAIN AND NUMBNESS AFTER THE SURGERY. THE SURGEON NOTICED THAT THE SCREW WHICH WAS IMPLANTED IN S1 WAS CONTACTING TO NERVE. THEREFORE, REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017. THE INSERTION DIRECTION OF THE SCREW WAS CHANGED, THE SCREW SIZE WAS CHANGED WITH 8.5×45 AND ROD LENGTH WAS ALSO CHANGED WITH 6.0×40 .

    Patient problems: Injury; No Code Available; Numbness; Pain

    MAUDE report 6578647 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 15, 2017Break; Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; SCREW TULIP SPLAYED OPEN WHILE BLOCKER WAS BEING FINAL TIGHTENED WITH A STANDARD TORQUE WRENCH. THE DELAY WAS ONE MINUTE. SURGEON REMOVED THE CAP AND INSERTED IT AGAIN.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6567276 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 13, 2016Break; Material Deformation; Material Integrity Problem; Material Deformation; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW SPLAYED OPEN DURING BLOCKER INSERTION.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 5574741 ↗

Other Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices

All Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page