TARGET M0035424080Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · 360 Ultra Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TARGET (114)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540675927), received between Jan 16, 2017 and Dec 18, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture6
- Migration1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
- No Visual Prompts/Feedback1
- Premature Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 18, 2025Fracture; Fracture
ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THAT THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. THERE WAS NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23836085 ↗MalfunctionFeb 19, 2025No Visual Prompts/Feedback; No Visual Prompts/Feedback
IT WAS REPORTED AFTER THE EMBOLIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RELEASED FOR PLACEMENT, IT COULD NOT BE OBSERVED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21411909 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE MICROCATHETER WAS INSERTED INTO THE ANEURYSM AND THE SUBJECT COIL WAS INSERTED INTO THE MICROCATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN DETACHED THE SUBJECT COIL AND PULLED THE DELIVERY WIRE BUT THE SUBJECT COIL CAME OUT WITH THE DELIVERY WIRE. WHEN THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO REINSERT THE SUBJECT COIL INTO THE ANEURYSM, IT FRACTURED INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER. THE MICROCATHETER WAS REMOVED AS THE SUBJECT COIL WAS JAMMED INSIDE AND COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED. THE PHYSICIAN REPLACED BOTH DEVICES WITH NEW DEVICES AND CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20961970 ↗MalfunctionApr 12, 2023Fracture; Fracture
ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THAT THE SUBJECT COIL BROKE/FRACTURED DURING USE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16721983 ↗MalfunctionDec 9, 2022Fracture; Fracture
THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE SUBJECT COIL DELIVERY WIRE WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15951849 ↗MalfunctionAug 8, 2022Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, PHYSICIAN USED THE COILS BUT THE FIRST COIL WAS UNABLE TO DETACH. THE SUBJECT COIL WAS USED AS THE SECOND COIL AND DETACHED SUCCESSFULLY BUT IT WAS FLOATING FREELY INSIDE THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15189253 ↗MalfunctionDec 14, 2021Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DELIVERY WIRE OF THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13003245 ↗MalfunctionFeb 12, 2020Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING WIDE NECK IRREGULAR HEMORRHAGIC ANEURYSM PROCEDURE ON RIGHT POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY (PCOMA), THE SEGMENT OF THE SUBJECT COIL DELIVERY WIRE WAS FRACTURED AT ABOUT 1 CM FROM THE COIL AND THE FRACTURED PART OF THE COIL DELIVERY WIRE WAS COVERED/PRESSED BY THE STENT INSIDE THE ANEURYSM INSIDE THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AND THERE WERE NO REPORTED CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9703581 ↗MalfunctionJul 31, 2019Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) PREMATURELY DEPLOYED INTO THE MICROCATHETER HUB. THE PHYSICIAN REPLACED THE COIL AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8848789 ↗InjuryJan 16, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device
DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, THE COIL STRETCHED AND IT COULD NOT BE REMOVED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN DEPLOYED A STENT TO SECURE THE STRETCHED PORTION OF THE COIL AGAINST THE VESSEL WALL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6255132 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page