TARGET M0035425100Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · 360 Ultra Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TARGET (114)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540675958), received between Oct 5, 2016 and Feb 6, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Activation” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Premature Activation2
- Premature Separation2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Blood Loss1
- Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 6, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN ADVANCING THE SUBJECT COIL THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER, THE SUBJECT COIL GOT STUCK IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MICROCATHETER SHAFT AND WHEN AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO RETRIEVE IT, THE SUBJECT COIL BECOME STUCK IN THE MICROCATHETER SHAFT AND THE DELIVERY WIRE BROKE INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER SHAFT. THE ENTIRE MICROCATHETER WAS RETRIEVED. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21327693 ↗InjuryJul 17, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS PLACED. THE SUBJECT COIL BECAME STRETCHED AFTER REPOSITIONED SEVERAL TIMES AND THE SNARE WAS USED TO RETRIEVE IT. THE PHYSICIAN REPLACED IT WITH A NEW DEVICE AND CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17331462 ↗MalfunctionNov 30, 2022Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A NEUROVASCULAR PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT COIL FELT RESISTANCE ADVANCING THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. WHEN THE OPERATOR ADVANCED THE SUBJECT COIL THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER, THE SUBJECT COIL GOT STUCK IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MICROCATHETER. THEREFORE, THE OPERATOR TRIED TO PULL BACK THE SUBJECT COIL, WHILE DOING SO THE SUBJECT COIL DETACHED PREMATURELY IN THE MICROCATHETER. THE SUBJECT COIL AND THE MICROCATHETER WERE REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15890782 ↗MalfunctionNov 28, 2020Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ICPC (INTERNAL CAROTID - POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY) DOUBLE CATHETER ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, WHILE COILING THE ANEURYSM WHEN THIS COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS USED THERE WAS STRONG RESISTANCE AND IT FELT AS IF THE COIL WAS GOING TO STRETCHED. SO, THE COIL WAS ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE ALONG WITH THE MC, BUT IT PREMATURELY DETACHED (DETACHED UNINTENTIONALLY WITHOUT USING IN-ZONE), BUT OPERATOR WAS ABLE TO PLACE. THE PREMATURELY DETACHED COIL INSIDE THE ANEURYSM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10915331 ↗InjuryMar 16, 2017Premature Activation; Premature Activation
THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED FRICTION WHILE TRYING TO REPOSITIONED THE COIL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL WAS REPOSITIONED APPROXIMATELY 3 TO 4 TIMES WHEN IT DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN PROCEEDED TO CUT THE HUB OF THE MICROCATHETER IN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE COIL; HOWEVER, THE COIL BECAME JAMMED IN THE MICROCATHETER; THEREFORE, THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE MICROCATHETER ALONG WITH THE COIL. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY, AND THE PATIENT'S BLOOD PRESSURE DROPPED SEVERAL TIMES AND THE PATIENT LOST ONE LITER OF BLOOD. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO RESIDUAL EFFECT ON THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Blood Loss; Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension
MAUDE report 6412024 ↗MalfunctionOct 5, 2016Premature Activation; Premature Activation
THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DETACHED THE COIL AFTER SEVERAL DETACHMENT ATTEMPTS; THEREFORE, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO REMOVE IT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AS THE COIL WAS BEING REMOVED, IT PREMATURELY DETACHED, RESULTING IN PART OF THE COIL PROTRUDING INTO THE PARENT VESSEL. THERE WERE NO REPORTED CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6001613 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page