Skip to content

TARGET M0035425100Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · 360 Ultra Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TARGET (114)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540675958), received between Oct 5, 2016 and Feb 6, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Activation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Activation2
  • Premature Separation2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Blood Loss1
  • Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 6, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN ADVANCING THE SUBJECT COIL THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER, THE SUBJECT COIL GOT STUCK IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MICROCATHETER SHAFT AND WHEN AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO RETRIEVE IT, THE SUBJECT COIL BECOME STUCK IN THE MICROCATHETER SHAFT AND THE DELIVERY WIRE BROKE INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER SHAFT. THE ENTIRE MICROCATHETER WAS RETRIEVED. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21327693 ↗
  • InjuryJul 17, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS PLACED. THE SUBJECT COIL BECAME STRETCHED AFTER REPOSITIONED SEVERAL TIMES AND THE SNARE WAS USED TO RETRIEVE IT. THE PHYSICIAN REPLACED IT WITH A NEW DEVICE AND CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17331462 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 30, 2022Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A NEUROVASCULAR PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT COIL FELT RESISTANCE ADVANCING THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. WHEN THE OPERATOR ADVANCED THE SUBJECT COIL THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER, THE SUBJECT COIL GOT STUCK IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MICROCATHETER. THEREFORE, THE OPERATOR TRIED TO PULL BACK THE SUBJECT COIL, WHILE DOING SO THE SUBJECT COIL DETACHED PREMATURELY IN THE MICROCATHETER. THE SUBJECT COIL AND THE MICROCATHETER WERE REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15890782 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 28, 2020Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ICPC (INTERNAL CAROTID - POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY) DOUBLE CATHETER ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, WHILE COILING THE ANEURYSM WHEN THIS COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS USED THERE WAS STRONG RESISTANCE AND IT FELT AS IF THE COIL WAS GOING TO STRETCHED. SO, THE COIL WAS ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE ALONG WITH THE MC, BUT IT PREMATURELY DETACHED (DETACHED UNINTENTIONALLY WITHOUT USING IN-ZONE), BUT OPERATOR WAS ABLE TO PLACE. THE PREMATURELY DETACHED COIL INSIDE THE ANEURYSM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10915331 ↗
  • InjuryMar 16, 2017Premature Activation; Premature Activation

    THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED FRICTION WHILE TRYING TO REPOSITIONED THE COIL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL WAS REPOSITIONED APPROXIMATELY 3 TO 4 TIMES WHEN IT DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN PROCEEDED TO CUT THE HUB OF THE MICROCATHETER IN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE COIL; HOWEVER, THE COIL BECAME JAMMED IN THE MICROCATHETER; THEREFORE, THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE MICROCATHETER ALONG WITH THE COIL. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY, AND THE PATIENT'S BLOOD PRESSURE DROPPED SEVERAL TIMES AND THE PATIENT LOST ONE LITER OF BLOOD. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO RESIDUAL EFFECT ON THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Blood Loss; Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension

    MAUDE report 6412024 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 5, 2016Premature Activation; Premature Activation

    THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DETACHED THE COIL AFTER SEVERAL DETACHMENT ATTEMPTS; THEREFORE, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO REMOVE IT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AS THE COIL WAS BEING REMOVED, IT PREMATURELY DETACHED, RESULTING IN PART OF THE COIL PROTRUDING INTO THE PARENT VESSEL. THERE WERE NO REPORTED CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6001613 ↗

Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices

All DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page