Target M0035433060Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Helical Ultra Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TARGET (114)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540676078), received between Aug 29, 2018 and Nov 22, 2025 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture3
- Premature Separation2
- Break1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 22, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE OPERATOR ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE WHEN PUSHING THE SUBJECT COIL INTO THE MICROCATHETER. WHEN THE OPERATOR WAS PULLING THE SUBJECT COIL BACK, IT DETACHED FROM THE WIRE AND BECAME STUCK IN THE STROKE OF THE CATHETER. A 10-MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY WAS REPORTED DUE TO THIS EVENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23625022 ↗MalfunctionMay 7, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE WHEN DELIVERING THE SUBJECT COIL SIGNIFICANT RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER. THE OPERATOR MANAGED TO PUSH THE SUBJECT COIL OUT OF THE MICROCATHETER TO FILL THE ANEURYSM. WHEN ATTEMPTING TO DETACH IT, THE SUBJECT COIL WOULD NOT ADVANCE. THE OPERATOR THEN WITHDREW THE SUBJECT COIL AND FOUND THAT ITS DETACHMENT POINT HAD FRACTURED. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19262442 ↗MalfunctionFeb 20, 2023Fracture; Fracture
THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE INVESTIGATION OF THE DEVICE REVEALED THAT MAIN COIL FRACTURED DURING USE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16404353 ↗MalfunctionSep 8, 2022Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) COULD NOT BE DETACHED AFTER IT WAS ADVANCED INTO LUMEN OF ANEURYSM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT. THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) DELIVERY WIRE WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15376284 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2019Premature Separation; Premature Separation
DURING THE COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN THOUGHT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS DETACHED AFTER HEARING THREE BEEP SOUND FROM THE POWER SUPPLY. HOWEVER, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN WAS RETRACTING THE DELIVERY WIRE, HE OBSERVED THAT THE COIL CAME ALONG WITH THE DELIVERY WIRE AND WAS DETACHED IN THE MICROCATHETER. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES REPORTED TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9335712 ↗MalfunctionAug 29, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN BROKE THE COIL DURING PREPARATION WHILE REMOVING THE COIL FROM THE HOOP. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 7830984 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page