Target M0035433100Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Helical Ultra Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TARGET (114)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540676092), received between Jan 11, 2019 and Jan 20, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture5
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Premature Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- Thrombosis1
- Thrombosis/Thrombus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 20, 2026Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS USED IN THE MEDICAL PROCEDURE. HOWEVER, THE SUBJECT DEVICE GOT DETACHED INSIDE THE SHAFT OF THE MICROCATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN PULLED OUT THE SUBJECT DEVICE ALONG WITH THE MICROCATHETER AND FOUND A THROMBUS AT THE DISTAL TIP OF THE COIL. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 24127237 ↗MalfunctionMar 19, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT COIL COULD NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE MICROCATHETER. THE SUBJECT COIL WAS STUCK IN THE MICROCATHETER. THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL DELIVERY WIRE WAS BROKEN FRACTURED DURING USE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH ANOTHER DEVICE WITHOUT ANY CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21648664 ↗MalfunctionFeb 14, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A COILING PROCEDURE, SUBJECT COIL GOT STRETCHED WITHIN MICROCATHETER. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18701373 ↗InjuryMar 15, 2023Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A COILING PROCEDURE IN ACOM (ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY), THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DEPLOY THIRD COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE), BUT THE MICROCATHETER KEPT KICKING OUT OF THE ANEURYSM. THE PHYSICIAN MANIPULATED THE CATHETER TO TRY AND GET THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) TO SIT IN THE ANEURYSM. BUT THE MICROCATHETER KICKED FULLY OUT AND WHILE TRYING TO PULL THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) BACK INTO THE MICROCATHETER THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) GOT HUNG UP ON THE STENT. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO PULL WITH FORCE TO REMOVE THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) AND THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) SEPARATED FROM THE DELIVERY WIRE. THE PHYSICIAN THEN SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WITH A SNARE, AND DID FOLLOW UP IMAGING CONFIRMING THAT THERE WAS NO HARM DONE TO THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16550212 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2022Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE OF CEREBRAL ANEURYSM TREATMENT THE SUBJECT COIL DELIVERY WIRE FRACTURED IN THE MICROCATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN REPLACED IT WITH A NEW DEVICE AND CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15265229 ↗InjuryAug 26, 2021Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS ADVANCING IN THE MICROCATHETER, THE SUBJECT COIL WAS OBSERVED UNDER THE FLUOROSCOPY TO BE BROKEN (AT DISTAL PART). THE MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE BROKEN PART AND INTRODUCE WITH ANOTHER COIL RESULTING 30 MINUTES SURGICAL DELAY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW COIL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12374654 ↗InjuryJan 11, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, THE COIL WAS ONCE INSERTED AND RECOILING SEVERAL TIMES, BUT COIL WAS NOT PLACED IN THE RIGHT POSITION. SO, IT WAS REMOVED AND ATTEMPTED TO REINSERT BUT THERE WAS A RESISTANCE. ONCE THE COIL WAS REMOVED AND CHECKED, THERE WAS THROMBUS ADHERED. THE PRODUCT WAS EXCHANGED WITH THE SAME PRODUCT AND PROCEDURE COMPLETED WITHOUT PROBLEMS.NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE EVENT.
Patient problems: Thrombosis
MAUDE report 8241413 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page