Target M0035434080Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Helical Ultra Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TARGET (114)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540676115), received between Sep 3, 2021 and Feb 13, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture4
- Premature Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 13, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING DETACHMENT PROCEDURE, THE PROXIMAL END OF THE SUBJECT COIL DELIVERY WIRE WAS FOUND BROKEN DURING USE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18696033 ↗InjuryAug 16, 2023Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ACA (ANTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY) ANEURYSM CASE. AFTER INSERTING THREE COILS, THE OPERATOR DELIVERED THE FOURTH SUBJECT COIL AND DISTAL OF THE SUBJECT COIL GOT STUCK IN MICROCATHETER. WHEN THE OPERATOR MANIPULATE THE SUBJECT COIL FROM PROXIMAL, THE REACTION FROM DISTAL BECAME WEAKER. CONTINUED TO FILL AND AFTER DISTAL OF THE SUBJECT COIL WENT INTO ANEURYSM, THE OPERATOR FOUND THE DISTAL COULD NOT FOLLOW THE PROXIMAL MANIPULATION. WITHDREW THE DELIVERY WIRE SLIGHTLY AND FOUND THE SUBJECT COIL FRACTURED AT THE SEGMENT THAT IS NOT THE DETACHMENT ZONE. THE OPERATOR USED GUIDEWIRE AS A MEDICAL INTERVENTION TO PUSH THE RESIDUAL OF THE SUBJECT COIL TO GO INTO ANEURYSM INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER TO FINISH. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT IS ALREADY WAKE UP.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17557448 ↗MalfunctionJun 13, 2023Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AT THE TIME OF RELEASE THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE), IT WAS PARTIALLY RELEASED, REMAINING ADHERED TO THE DELIVERY SYSTEM, WHICH WAS LEFT OUTSIDE THE ANEURYSMAL SAC, RUPTURING BETWEEN THE STRUTS OF THE STENT AND THE VESSEL WALL. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17119173 ↗MalfunctionFeb 21, 2022Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ANEURYSMAL COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED IN INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY IN A PATIENT. DURING THE PROCEDURE WHEN THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO ADVANCE THE SUBJECT COIL THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER, THE PHYSICIAN FELT RESISTANCE AND THE SUBJECT COIL DETACHED PREMATURELY IN THE PROXIMAL PART OF THE MICROCATHETER. THE SUBJECT COIL WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13573323 ↗MalfunctionSep 3, 2021Fracture; Fracture
THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE INVESTIGATION OF THE DEVICE REVEALED THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12425038 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page