Skip to content

TARGET M0035475100Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · 360 Soft Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TARGET (114)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540676498), received between Mar 29, 2018 and Dec 16, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture3
  • Inadequate User Interface1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • Premature Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Aneurysm1
  • Intracranial Hemorrhage1
  • Rupture1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 16, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT IN A CASE OF CEREBRAL ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION FOR SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE (SAH) AT POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERIES (PCA) THE SUBJECT COIL WAS PLACED AS THE THIRD COIL AND ATTEMPTED TO BE DETACHED; HOWEVER, IT COULD NOT BE DETACHED. WHEN THE COIL DELIVERY WIRE WAS REMOVED FROM THE FUNNEL OF THE POWER SUPPLY, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED. IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE ELECTRODE PART WAS PREMATURELY DETACHED AND REMAINED INSIDE OF THE POWER SUPPLY. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL DELIVERY WIRE WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23817657 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 2, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE OPERATOR RETRACTED THE SUBJECT COIL FOR REPOSITIONING. WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS REINSERTED, IT GOT CAUGHT BETWEEN THE INTRODUCER SHEATH AND THE MICROCATHETER'S HUB, AND PREMATURELY DETACHED IN THE MICROCATHETER'S SHAFT. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22385367 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 2, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS SELECTED FOR ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM PROCEDURE. HOWEVER, WHILE ADVANCING THE COIL WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO RETRACT THE COIL AND FOUND IT TO BE STRETCHED. THUS, THE COIL ALONG WITH THE MICROCATHETER WAS WITHDRAWN AND THE COIL WAS FOUND TO BE STRETCHED AND FRACTURED. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21947697 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 9, 2022Fracture; Fracture

    THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) DELIVERY WIRE WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN/FRACTURE DURING USE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15947778 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 1, 2021Inadequate User Interface; Inadequate User Interface

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE MIDDLE PART OF THE SUBJECT COIL BECAME INVISIBLE UNDER FLUOROSCOPY AND PHYSICIAN STATED THAT THE PHYSICIAN MIGHT HAVE OVERTIGHTENED THE HUB WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS INSERTED INTO THE MICRO CATHETER AND THE COIL GOT STRETCHED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11396334 ↗
  • InjuryMar 29, 2018Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) PERFORATED AND PROTRUDED OUT OF THE ANEURYSM CAUSING THE ANEURYSM TO BURST AND BLEEDING TO OCCUR. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH PROTAMINE AND THE ANEURYSM WAS COILED SUCCESSFULLY AND THE BLEEDING STOPPED. THE PATIENT IS RECOVERING. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Aneurysm; Intracranial Hemorrhage; Rupture

    MAUDE report 7383134 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page