Skip to content

MATRIX2 M003497320SR0Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · Helical Ultrasoft SR Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540691699), received between Mar 29, 2018 and Oct 3, 2018 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1
  • Premature Activation1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 3, 2018No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event

    IT WAS REPORTED RESISTANCE WAS FELT, THE COIL STRETCHED AND WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITH A SNARE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7932535 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING COIL EMBOLIZATION OF AN ANEURYSM, WHEN HALF OF THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS ALREADY INSIDE THE ANEURYSM SAC, THE COIL ELONGATED/STRETCHED AND THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT ABLE TO CONTROL THE COIL. THE COIL BROKE INTO 2 PARTS. THE PART OF THE COIL INSIDE THE ANEURYSM WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED USING A REMOVER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7660683 ↗
  • InjuryMar 29, 2018Premature Activation; Premature Activation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) PREMATURELY DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE COIL WAS RETRIEVED ALONG WITH THE MICROCATHETER USING A GOOSE NECK SNARE DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING A DIFFERENT COIL. THERE WERE NO REPORTED CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7382255 ↗

Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices

All DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page