MATRIX2 M003497320SR0Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Helical Ultrasoft SR Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540691699), received between Mar 29, 2018 and Oct 3, 2018 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- No Apparent Adverse Event1
- Premature Activation1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 3, 2018No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
IT WAS REPORTED RESISTANCE WAS FELT, THE COIL STRETCHED AND WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITH A SNARE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7932535 ↗InjuryJul 3, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING COIL EMBOLIZATION OF AN ANEURYSM, WHEN HALF OF THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS ALREADY INSIDE THE ANEURYSM SAC, THE COIL ELONGATED/STRETCHED AND THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT ABLE TO CONTROL THE COIL. THE COIL BROKE INTO 2 PARTS. THE PART OF THE COIL INSIDE THE ANEURYSM WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED USING A REMOVER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7660683 ↗InjuryMar 29, 2018Premature Activation; Premature Activation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) PREMATURELY DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE COIL WAS RETRIEVED ALONG WITH THE MICROCATHETER USING A GOOSE NECK SNARE DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING A DIFFERENT COIL. THERE WERE NO REPORTED CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7382255 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page