Skip to content

TARGET M0035474510Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · 360 Soft Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TARGET (114)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540714787), received between Apr 20, 2021 and Sep 25, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture1
  • Premature Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 25, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY (ACOM ARTERY) SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE (SAH) CASE, WHEN SUBJECT COIL WAS GETTING DEPLOYED INTO THE ANEURYSM, IT WAS FOUND THAT A PART OF THE SUBJECT COIL GOT BROKEN. WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETRIEVED KINK LIKE SHAPE WAS FOUND BETWEEN THE FIRST LOOP AND THE SECOND LOOP OF THE SUBJECT COIL. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH ANOTHER DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20306097 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 20, 2021Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A.COM (ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY) ANEURYSM ENDOVASCULAR COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE IN THE PATIENT WITH MULTI-VESSEL DISEASE, WHILE ADVANCEMENT OF THE SUBJECT COIL INTO THE MICROCATHETER IT SHOWED RESISTANCE FOR FURTHER CONTINUOUS INTRODUCTION OF THE COIL INSIDE ANEURYSM. SO THE OPERATOR TRIED TO WITHDRAW THE COIL WHICH GOT STUCK INTO THE MICROCATHETER AND DETACHED PREMATURELY WITHOUT ANY DETACHMENT ATTEMPT WITH DETACHMENT SYSTEM. THEREFORE OPERATOR WITHDREW THE MICROCATHETER FROM PATIENT VASCULATURE WITH THE PREMATURELY DETACHED COIL IN IT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AFTER SMOOTH DEPLOYMENT OF THE TWO COILS INTO THE TARGET ANEURYSM USING SAME MICROCATHETER. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11697876 ↗

Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices

All DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page