Skip to content

ASAHI Gladius18 PPW18R300SRecalls & reported problems

Asahi Intecc CO., Ltd. · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04547327106726), received between Dec 23, 2020 and Sep 2, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Material Fragmentation1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 2, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANGIOGRAPHY WAS PERFORMED FOR A MILDLY TORTUOUS, HEAVILY CALCIFIED CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO) IN THE MID POPLITEAL ARTERY. AN ASAHI GLADIUS GUIDE WIRE HAD FRACTURED DURING MANIPULATION. THE WIRE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED WITH A SNARE. IT WAS INFORMED THAT THE PATIENT WAS FINE AFTER THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22931493 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 21, 2025Break; Material Fragmentation; Break; Material Fragmentation

    GUIDE WIRE BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT AND THE PIECE WAS RETRIEVED WITH A SNARE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22866481 ↗
  • InjuryDec 23, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF AN ASAHI GLADIUS 18 GUIDE WIRE CAME OFF DURING A PERCUTANEOUS PERIPHERAL INTERVENTION (PPI) TO TREAT A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO) IN THE PROXIMAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). THE GUIDE WIRE WAS USED WITH A NON-ASAHI TRAILBLAZER SUPPORT CATHETER DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE SEPARATED TIP WAS SNARED AND NOTHING WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DISCHARGED WITHOUT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11061913 ↗

Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices

All WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page