GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE GA3501Recalls & reported problems
Terumo Corporation · RADIFOCUS GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE Guidewire · Class 2
All models of GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE (5)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04987350703620), received between Apr 9, 2019 and Mar 16, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Peeled/Delaminated” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Peeled/Delaminated4
- Break2
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 16, 2026Break
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE PROCEDURE WHEN THE GLIDEWIRE WAS REMOVED, THE END OF THE WIRE APPEARED TO HAVE SHREDDED, AND PART OF THE TIP/PLASTIC REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENTS GROIN AREA. THEY WERE ABLE TO REMOVE THE PIECE FROM THE PATIENT. ESTABLISHMENT VASCULAR ACCESS FEMORAL APPROACH FOR ENDOVASCULAR STENT INSERTION INTO ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM WAS THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED FOR THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24606328 ↗InjuryMay 7, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE INVOLVED GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE WAS USED THROUGH A METAL CYSTOSCOPE DURING A CYSTOSCOPE PROCEDURE. DURING WITHDRAWAL IT WAS NOTICED THAT SOME OF GREEN/WHITE PORTION OF WIRE WAS SHAVED OFF. THE REPORTED EVENT DID NOT RESULT IN PATIENT INJURY AND/OR REQUIRE MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION. THERE IS NOT A DIRECT ALLEGATION THAT THE REPORTED DEVICE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO PATIENT INJURY AND/OR NEED FOR MEDICAL INTERVENTION. NO BLOOD LOSS WAS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 17APR2024: THE GREEN/WHITE PORTION OF THE WIRE DID SHAVE OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE SHAVED PORTION WAS REMOVED THROUGH METAL CYSTOSCOPE. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THE PATIENT HAD PLAQUE OR STENOSIS PRESENT. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 19259115 ↗InjuryMay 7, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE INVOLVED GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE WAS USED THROUGH A METAL CYSTOSCOPE DURING A CYSTOSCOPE PROCEDURE. DURING WITHDRAWAL IT WAS NOTICED THAT SOME OF GREEN/WHITE PORTION OF WIRE WAS SHAVED OFF. THE REPORTED EVENT DID NOT RESULT IN PATIENT INJURY AND/OR REQUIRE MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION. THERE IS NOT A DIRECT ALLEGATION THAT THE REPORTED DEVICE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO PATIENT INJURY AND/OR NEED FOR MEDICAL INTERVENTION. NO BLOOD LOSS WAS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 17APR2024: THE GREEN/WHITE PORTION OF THE WIRE DID SHAVE OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE SHAVED PORTION WAS REMOVED THROUGH METAL CYSTOSCOPE. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THE PATIENT HAD PLAQUE OR STENOSIS PRESENT. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 19258884 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE COATING OF THE ADVANTAGE WIRE WAS STRIPPED OFF IN ONE AREA. THEY DID USE WIRE ON THE PATIENT AND THEN IT WAS NOTICED. THERE WAS NO KNOWN HARM TO THE PATIENT; HOWEVER, IT WAS UNKNOWN WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT PORTION OF WIRE COATING. NO BLOOD LOSS WAS REPORTED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY/MEDIAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THERE IS NOT A DIRECT ALLEGATION THAT THE REPORTED DEVICE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO PATIENT INJURY AND/OR NEED FOR MEDICAL INTERVENTION. THE EVENT OCCURRED INTRA-OPERATIVE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 06 FEB 2024: THE PROCEDURE WAS AN EXCHANGE OF A NEPHROSTOMY TUBE TO A NEPHROURETERAL PLACEMENT. THE SIZE WAS THREE DIFFERENT SPOTS. THE FIRST WAS A VERY SHORT SEGMENT LESS THAN A MILLIMETER (MM). THE SECOND WAS APPROXIMATELY 6MM AND THE THIRD WAS 3-4MM. THERE WAS SOME DIFFICULTY WHEN EXCHANGING ONE CATHETER TO THE NEXT, WHERE IT WAS NOT A SMOOTH TRANSITION OVER THE WIRE. NO TESTING WAS DONE, AND PIECES WERE NOT FOUND. NO INTERVENTION WAS NEEDED. THE PATIENT HAD NO COMPLICATIONS, PATIENT WAS GOOD.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18659475 ↗MalfunctionDec 21, 2023Peeled/Delaminated; Material Deformation; Peeled/Delaminated; Material Deformation
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE WIRE BECAME UNBRAIDED AND PEELED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY OR MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS. THERE IS NOT A DIRECT ALLEGATION THAT THE REPORTED DEVICE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO PATIENT INJURY AND/OR NEED FOR MEDICAL INTERVENTION. THE EVENT OCCURRED INTRA-OPERATIVE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON (B)(6)2023: THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS A PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHY. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE AND CONTINUE THE PROCEDURE AS PLANNED, THE WIRE WAS EXCHANGED FOR A VERSACORE WIRE. THE DISTAL PORTION WHERE THE BREAKDOWN OF THE WIRE WAS DID NOT ENTER THE PATIENT'S BODY. NO FURTHER MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS NECESSARY FOR THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION. ADDITIONAL DEVICES OR EQUIPMENT USED WITH THE REPORTED WIRE WAS A 5 FR UF. IT WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE PLACED OVER WIRE; HOWEVER, THE UF WOULD NOT ADVANCE AND BOTH PRODUCTS WERE REMOVED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18371483 ↗MalfunctionApr 9, 2019Break; Break
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE INVOLVED RADIFOCUS GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE BROKE APART DURING A LEG CASE. IT WAS A BAD BIFURCATION WITH A LOT OF CALCIUM. THE DOCTOR THINKS THE GLIDE PORTION BROKE APART WHEN HE PULLED THE WIRE BACK THROUGH THE CALCIUM. THE BLOOD LOSS WAS LESS THAN 250CC. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED APRIL 1, 2019. THE WIRE DID NOT BREAK APART COMPLETELY. THEY WERE ABLE TO RETRIEVE THE WIRE FROM THE PATIENT COMPLETELY. THE PERIPHERAL INTERVENTION WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH ANOTHER WIRE.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8495728 ↗
Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices
- HI-TORQUE BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT UNIVERSAL II 1009664Abbott Vascular Inc. · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER321 reports
- SYNCHRO 14 M00313010Stryker Corporation · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER2 recalls220 reports
- PressureWire™ C12059Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER1 death296 reports
- SYNCHRO 2 M00326410Stryker Corporation · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER2 recalls155 reports
- ENROUTE .014" Guidewire 11686-01Silk Road Medical, Inc. · Wire, Guide, Catheter2 deaths228 reports
- ARROW IPN035915Teleflex Incorporated · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER217 reports
- OmniWire Pressure guide wire 89185Philips Image Guided Therapy Corporation · Wire, Guide, Catheter1 recall1 death160 reports
- ARROW IPN055780Teleflex Incorporated · Wire, guide, catheter4 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page