Skip to content

GLIDEWIRE GS3543Recalls & reported problems

Terumo Corporation · RADIFOCUS GLIDEWIRE · Class 2

All models of GLIDEWIRE (30)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04987350726704), received between May 23, 2025 and May 23, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 2 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 23, 2025Difficult to Remove; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Difficult to Remove; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR HAD A 450CM STIFF ANGLED GLIDEWIRE GOING FROM THE LEFT RADIAL ARTERY TO THE RIGHT PERONEAL ARTERY AND PROCEEDED TO INTRODUCE A 3MMX100MM METACROSS R2P BALLOON INTO THE POPLITEAL ARTERY WHERE HE BEGAN INFLATING TO NOMINAL PRESSURES ALL ALONG THE POPLITEAL AND SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERIES WITH GOOD SUCCESS. THE BALLOON WAS THEN BROUGHT BACK THROUGH THE DESTINATION SLENDER 119CM SHEATH AND EXITED TO SHEATH WITHOUT ISSUE. ONCE THE BALLOON WAS OUT OF THE SHEATH ABOUT 20CM IT STOPPED TRACKING ON THE STIFF GLIDEWIRE. THE DOCTOR TRIED PULLING HARD WITH HANDS, THEN WITH CLAMPS AND FINALLY TO RELEASE IT WITH A KNIFE TO NO AVAIL, THE BALLOON WAS STUCK ON THE WIRE. HE HAD TO TAKE THE WIRE OUT OF THE BODY AND GET A NEW WIRE. THE PROCEDURE WAS A RADIAL TO RIGHT LEG PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM (B)(4) REGARDING THE INVESTIGATION OF THEIR DEVICE AND THE REPORTED GUIDEWIRE ON 25APR2025: THE CATHETER WAS RETURNED WITH THE GUIDEWIRE (GW) STUCK INSIDE. MULTIPLE SECTIONS OF THE GUIDEWIRE (GW) SHOWED PEELED COATING, SHAFT DEFORMATION, AND FRACTURES. THE INNER SHAFT WAS FOUND ADHERED TO THE GUIDEWIRE (GW)

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22077962 ↗
  • InjuryMay 23, 2025Difficult to Remove; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Difficult to Remove; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR HAD A 450CM STIFF ANGLED GLIDEWIRE GOING FROM THE LEFT RADIAL ARTERY TO THE RIGHT PERONEAL ARTERY AND PROCEEDED TO INTRODUCE A 3MMX100MM METACROSS R2P BALLOON INTO THE POPLITEAL ARTERY WHERE HE BEGAN INFLATING TO NOMINAL PRESSURES ALL ALONG THE POPLITEAL AND SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERIES WITH GOOD SUCCESS. THE BALLOON WAS THEN BROUGHT BACK THROUGH THE DESTINATION SLENDER 119CM SHEATH AND EXITED TO SHEATH WITHOUT ISSUE. ONCE THE BALLOON WAS OUT OF THE SHEATH ABOUT 20CM IT STOPPED TRACKING ON THE STIFF GLIDEWIRE. THE DOCTOR TRIED PULLING HARD WITH HANDS, THEN WITH CLAMPS AND FINALLY TO RELEASE IT WITH A KNIFE TO NO AVAIL, THE BALLOON WAS STUCK ON THE WIRE. HE HAD TO TAKE THE WIRE OUT OF THE BODY AND GET A NEW WIRE. THE PROCEDURE WAS A RADIAL TO RIGHT LEG PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM KANEKA REGARDING THE INVESTIGATION OF THEIR DEVICE AND THE REPORTED GLIDEWIRE ON 25APR2025: THE CATHETER WAS RETURNED WITH THE GLIDEWIRE (GW) STUCK INSIDE. MULTIPLE SECTIONS OF THE GLIDEWIRE (GW) SHOWED PEELED COATING, SHAFT DEFORMATION, AND FRACTURES. THE INNER SHAFT WAS FOUND ADHERED TO THE GLIDEWIRE (GW)

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22077951 ↗

Other Wire, guide, catheter devices

All Wire, guide, catheter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page