Skip to content

GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE TRACK GAT1418Recalls & reported problems

Terumo Corporation · RADIFOCUS GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE TRACK Guide wire · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04987350727862), received between Apr 22, 2025 and Apr 22, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 2 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation2

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 22, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THEY HAD A DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS (DVT) PROCEDURE. THEY ATTEMPTED TO CROSS THE CAP OF THE LESION HOWEVER, THE WIRE GOT STUCK IN THE WEBBING AND BROKE OFF IN THE PATIENT. THE WIRE IS IN A STABLE POSITION AND WILL NOT NEED TO BE REMOVED. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 26MAR2025: THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE WIRE IS APPROXIMATELY 1-3CM LONG. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFUL. THEY DO NOT WANT TO TRY REMOVING THAT PART OF THE WIRE SINCE IT'S IN A SAFE, FIBROTIC LOCATION.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 21885032 ↗
  • InjuryApr 22, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THEY HAD A DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS (DVT) PROCEDURE. THEY ATTEMPTED TO CROSS THE CAP OF THE LESION HOWEVER, THE WIRE GOT STUCK IN THE WEBBING AND BROKE OFF IN THE PATIENT. THE WIRE IS IN A STABLE POSITION AND WILL NOT NEED TO BE REMOVED. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 26MAR2025: THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE WIRE IS APPROXIMATELY 1-3CM LONG. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFUL. THEY DO NOT WANT TO TRY REMOVING THAT PART OF THE WIRE SINCE IT'S IN A SAFE, FIBROTIC LOCATION.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 21885031 ↗

Other Wire, guide, catheter devices

All Wire, guide, catheter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page