Skip to content

GLIDECATH CG409Recalls & reported problems

Terumo Corporation · RADIFOCUS GLIDECATH · Class 2

All models of GLIDECATH (9)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04987350772077), received between Dec 12, 2019 and Dec 12, 2019 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2

Patient problems

  • No Information2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 12, 2019Break; Break

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR WAS TRYING TO PULL THE CATHETER OVER A WIRE AND THE CATHETER SNAPPED IN TO MULTIPLE PIECES. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION. THE PROCEDURE OUTCOME WAS SUCCESSFUL.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 9460826 ↗
  • InjuryDec 12, 2019Break; Break

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2019. THERE WAS NO CATHETER LEFT IN THE PATIENT AND NO FURTHER INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 9460819 ↗

Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page