Pacel™ 401770Recalls & reported problems
St. Jude Medical Cardiovascular Division · Bipolar Pacing Catheter · Class 2
All models of Pacel (9)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05414734001113), received between Oct 8, 2024 and Aug 12, 2026 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Too Rigid or Stiff” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Material Too Rigid or Stiff1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information1
- Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension1
- Pericardial Effusion1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 12, 2026Material Too Rigid or Stiff
It was reported that a Pacel Bipolar Pacing Catheter was implanted due to atrial fibrillation with a slow ventricular rate (bradycardia). There was no vessel preparation and no other devices were involved. Intraoperative testing demonstrated satisfactory pacing parameters. The catheter was secured with pressure dressing, and the patient was transferred back to the ward. On postoperative day 1, 2.5 hours following Pacel electrode extraction, the patient developed hypotension. The patient¿s base rate was 130/90. Bedside ultrasound examination confirmed the presence of pericardial effusion without obvious perforation. Pericardiocentesis and drainage were performed promptly. Following the procedure, the patient's blood pressure increased, and repeat ultrasound confirmed that the pericardial effusion was no longer increasing. A drainage catheter was left in place, and the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for observation. On postoperative day 2, the patient's vital signs remained stable with no significant changes compared to the previous day. On (b)(6) 2026, the patient remains under observation in the ICU due to a small amount of fluid that has continued to leak fr
Patient problems: Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension; Pericardial Effusion
MAUDE report 50223215 ↗DeathOct 8, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AFTER USING THE TEMPORARY PACING CATHETER, THE PATIENT EXPIRED. THE CAUSE OF DEATH REMAINS UNCERTAIN.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20398290 ↗
Other ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER, TEMPORARY devices
- N/A 006173PC. R. Bard, Inc. · ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER, TEMPORARY161 reports
- SWAN-GANZ D200F7Edwards Lifesciences LLC · ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER, TEMPORARY1 recall0 reports
- ETHICON TPW32Ethicon, LLC · ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER, TEMPORARY1 death46 reports
- ETHICON TPW20Ethicon, LLC · ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER, TEMPORARY39 reports
- N/A 520007PC. R. Bard, Inc. · ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER, TEMPORARY33 reports
- Pacel™ 401763St. Jude Medical Cardiovascular Division · ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER, TEMPORARY21 reports
- Pacel™ 401771St. Jude Medical Cardiovascular Division · ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER, TEMPORARY1 death16 reports
- SWAN-GANZ PACING TD CATHETER D205F7Edwards Lifesciences LLC · Electrode, Pacemaker, Temporary13 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page