Skip to content

Cefaly® CEFALY DUAL EnhancedRecalls & reported problems

Cefaly Technology SPRL · Cefaly DUAL Enhanced is a newer version of Cefaly DUAL which is an FDA - cleared device Indications for Use: CEFALY DUAL Enhanced is for patients diagnosed by a physician with migraines per the FDA cleared indications for use. CEFALY DUAL Enhanced is indicated to be used for: The acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 18 years of age or older. The preventative treatment of episodic migraine in patients 18 years of age or older. · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05425018850273), received between Dec 29, 2023 and Apr 8, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 2 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information3

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THIS DOCUMENT IS A PRELIMINARY REPORT BASED ON THE INFORMATION CURRENTLY AVAILABLE, PREPARED WITH CAREFUL CONSIDERATION. AT THIS TIME, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE INDICATING THAT THE ISSUE IS DUE TO A MALFUNCTION OF THE CEFALY PRODUCT. THE DEVICE HAS BEEN RETURNED BY THE CUSTOMER AND IS NOW ON ITS WAY TO THE FACTORY FOR A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION. A DETAILED UPDATE WILL BE PROVIDED AFTER THE DEVICE HAS BEEN CLOSELY EXAMINED. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY DISCOVERED THE DEVICE WAS MELTED OVERNIGHT WHILE CHARGING . CUSTOMER SAID LAST USED THE DEVICE LAST WEEK OF THE INCIDENT AND AT THAT TIME THE DEVICE WERE FINE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19061980 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY DISCOVERED THE DEVICE WAS MELTED OVERNIGHT WHILE CHARGING . CUSTOMER SAID LAST USED THE DEVICE LAST WEEK OF THE INCIDENT AND AT THAT TIME THE DEVICE WERE FINE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19061975 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 29, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THIS DOCUMENT SERVES AS A PRELIMINARY REPORT, COMPILED WITH THE INFORMATION PRESENTLY AVAILABLE AND ADHERING TO THE PRINCIPLE OF CAUTION. CURRENTLY, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT THE ISSUE IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO A MALFUNCTION OF THE CEFALY PRODUCT. THE DEVICE IN QUESTION HAS BEEN RETURNED BY THE CUSTOMER AND IS PRESENTLY EN ROUTE TO THE FACTORY FOR IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS. A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE WILL BE ISSUED FOLLOWING A DETAILED EXAMINATION OF THE DEVICE. AS PER THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER, THE INCIDENT OCCURRED A FEW WEEKS PRIOR TO THEIR REPORT ON NOVEMBER 28, 2023. HOWEVER, THE CUSTOMER HAS NOT SPECIFY THE EXACT DATE OF THE INCIDENT. CONSEQUENTLY, THE DATE RECORDED IN SECTION B3 IS AN ESTIMATED ONE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY DISCOVERED THE PLASTIC HOUSING OF THE CEFALY DEVICE PARTIALLY MELTED ON THE CHARGING DOCK DURING THE CHARGING PROCESS. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE DEVICE HAD BEEN CHARGING FOR APPROXIMATELY FOUR HOURS PRIOR TO THE INCIDENT. IT IS IMPORTANT TO HIGHLIGHT THAT THE CHARGING DOCK WAS CONNECTED TO AN ADAPTER PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT, WHICH IS NOT A PRODUCT OF CEFALY. FURTHERMORE, THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT ALTHOUGH THE DEVICE HAD NOT BEEN HEAVILY USED IN

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18417424 ↗

Other Stimulator, Nerve, Electrical, Transcutaneous, For Migraine devices

All Stimulator, Nerve, Electrical, Transcutaneous, For Migraine devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page