Skip to content

Cefaly® CEFALY EnhancedRecalls & reported problems

Cefaly Technology SPRL · CEFALY Enhanced is for patients diagnosed by a physician with migraines per the FDA cleared indications for use. CEFALY Enhanced is indicated to be used for: Acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 18 years of age or older. Preventative treatment of migraine in patients 18 years of age or older. · Class 2

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05425018850280), received between Mar 9, 2026 and Mar 9, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2

Patient problems

  • Burn(s)2
  • Localized Skin Lesion2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 9, 2026Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THIS IS AN INCIDENT HAPPENED IN CANADA. THE SAME MODEL OF DEVICE ARE ON THE US MARKET UNDER FDA 510K CLEARANCE (K212071). THE INITIAL REPORT WAS RECEIVED BY CEFALY ON FEBRUARY 6, 2026. THE CEFALY MEDICAL TEAM REVIEWED THE CASE AND RECOMMENDED DIRECT FOLLOW UP WITH THE PATIENT TO FURTHER ASSESS SYMPTOM SEVERITY AND RELATEDNESS. ATTEMPTS TO CONTACT THE PATIENT ON FEBRUARY 6, 2026, BY PHONE AND EMAIL WERE UNSUCCESSFUL, AND CONTACT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THROUGH MEDICAL PERSONNEL. THE PATIENT LATER REQUESTED A PHONE DISCUSSION, WHICH WAS CONDUCTED BY THE CEFALY MEDICAL TEAM ON FEBRUARY 9, 2026, AT 19:30 EST, DURING WHICH THE PATIENT PROVIDED A DETAILED ACCOUNT OF THE EVENTS AS BELOW. THE PATIENT HAS AN APPROXIMATELY 10-YEAR HISTORY OF MIGRAINE, WITH PROGRESSIVE WORSENING PRIOR TO INITIATION OF CEFALY. HE CARRIES A DIAGNOSIS OF CHRONIC MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA, INTRACTABLE, WITH STATUS MIGRAINOSUS. HE BEGAN USING ETNS (CEFALY) IN (B)(6) 2026, INITIALLY COMPLETING APPROXIMATELY THREE PREVENTIVE SESSIONS, FOLLOWED MORE RECENTLY BY ACUTE THERAPY SESSIONS. HE REPORTED NO BENEFIT FROM PREVENTIVE USE, WHICH IS EXPECTED GIVEN THE DELAYED ONSET OF PREVENTIVE EFFICACY. WITH ACUTE THERAPY, HE REPO

    Patient problems: Burn(s); Localized Skin Lesion

    MAUDE report 24546280 ↗
  • InjuryMar 9, 2026Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THIS IS AN INCIDENT HAPPENED IN CANADA. THE SAME MODEL OF DEVICE ARE ON THE US MARKET UNDER FDA 510K CLEARANCE (K212071 ) THE INITIAL REPORT WAS RECEIVED BY CEFALY ON FEBRUARY 6, 2026. THE CEFALY MEDICAL TEAM REVIEWED THE CASE AND RECOMMENDED DIRECT FOLLOW UP WITH THE PATIENT TO FURTHER ASSESS SYMPTOM SEVERITY AND RELATEDNESS. ATTEMPTS TO CONTACT THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2026 BY PHONE AND EMAIL WERE UNSUCCESSFUL, AND CONTACT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THROUGH MEDICAL PERSONNEL. THE PATIENT LATER REQUESTED A PHONE DISCUSSION, WHICH WAS CONDUCTED BY THE CEFALY MEDICAL TEAM ON (B)(6) 2026 AT 19:30 EST, DURING WHICH THE PATIENT PROVIDED A DETAILED ACCOUNT OF THE EVENTS AS BELOW. THE PATIENT HAS AN APPROXIMATELY 10-YEAR HISTORY OF MIGRAINE, WITH PROGRESSIVE WORSENING PRIOR TO INITIATION OF CEFALY. HE CARRIES A DIAGNOSIS OF CHRONIC MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA, INTRACTABLE, WITH STATUS MIGRAINOSUS. HE BEGAN USING ETNS (CEFALY) IN (B)(6) 2026, INITIALLY COMPLETING APPROXIMATELY THREE PREVENTIVE SESSIONS, FOLLOWED MORE RECENTLY BY ACUTE THERAPY SESSIONS. HE REPORTED NO BENEFIT FROM PREVENTIVE USE, WHICH IS EXPECTED GIVEN THE DELAYED ONSET OF PREVENTIVE EFFICACY. WITH ACUTE THERAPY, HE REPORTED TRANSIE

    Patient problems: Burn(s); Localized Skin Lesion

    MAUDE report 24546279 ↗

Other Stimulator, Nerve, Electrical, Transcutaneous, For Migraine devices

All Stimulator, Nerve, Electrical, Transcutaneous, For Migraine devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.