Skip to content

LoFric® Hydro-Kit™ 42012Recalls & reported problems

Wellspect AB · Single Use Urinary Catheter LoFric Hydro-Kit Nelaton 16" 12FR · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07333387042817), received between Mar 25, 2025 and Apr 21, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Delivered as Unsterile Product” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 2 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Delivered as Unsterile Product2
  • Break1
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Leak/Splash1
  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Material Perforation1
  • Product Quality Problem1
  • Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Local Reaction1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 21, 2026Delivered as Unsterile Product

    THE ADVERSE EVENT OCCURRED OUTSIDE US, IN CYPRUS. A MALE PATIENT HAS BEEN USING, A STERILE, SINGLE-USE INTERMITTENT URINARY CATHETER LOFRIC HYDRO-KIT (40CM, CH12). ON MARCH 24TH, 2026, THE PATIENT CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE AND REPORTED THAT HE HAD RECEIVED THREE PRODUCTS WHERE THE PRIMARY PACKAGE WAS NOT SEALED COMPLETELY, IT HAD A HOLE AND WAS LEAKING. SINCE THE PRIMARY PACKAGE IS THE STERILE BARRIER OF THE PRODUCT, A HOLE IN THE PRIMARY PACKAGE IS COMPROMISING THE STERILE BARRIER OF THE PRODUCT. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT HE HAD USED THE PRODUCTS AND THAT HE HAD DISCARDED THEM AFTER USE. THE PATIENT DID NOT SUFFER ANY HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24940048 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 31, 2025Product Quality Problem; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Product Quality Problem; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging

    ADVERSE EVENT OCCURRED OUTSIDE US, IN ITALY. A MALE PATIENT HAS BEEN USING LOFRIC HYDRO-KIT NELATON (40CM, CH12) FOR 6 YEARS. ON OCTOBER 19, HE CONTACTED US TO LET US KNOW ABOUT SOME QUALITY ISSUES THAT HE HAD EXPERIENCED RECENTLY. ONE PRIMARY PACKAGE WAS MISSING THE CATHETER, AND ONE HAD A CATHETER WITH SALT RESIDUE ON IT. BOTH WHERE FROM THE SAME LOT. HE DID NOT USE THE CATHETERS, HE DISCARDED THEM AND USED OTHER ONES THAT HE HAD AT HIS DISPOSAL. HE DID HOWEVER SEND US SOME PICTURES. PATIENT REPORTED NO HEALTH IMPACT OR MEDICAL COMPLICATION. HE STATES THAT HE IS VERY HAPPY WITH THE PRODUCTS AND WILL CONTINUE TO USE LOFRIC HYDRO-KIT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23435006 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 28, 2025Material Perforation; Material Integrity Problem; Material Perforation; Material Integrity Problem

    MALFUNCTION OF A DEVICE OCCURRED OUTSIDE THE US, IN ITALY. A MALE PATIENT HAS BEEN USING LOFRIC HYDRO-KIT NELATON (40CM, CH12) FOR 2 YEARS. ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT CONTACTED HIS CATHETER PROVIDER AND REPORTED THAT THERE HAD BEEN PROBLEMS WITH LEAKING PRODUCTS FOR THE LAST MONTHS. THERE HAD BEEN 3-4 CATHETERS PER BOX (30 CATHETERS IN ONE BOX) THAT HAD LEAKED SO ABOUT 20-30 IN TOTAL AND ALL FROM THE SAME LOT. THE URINE LEAKED OUT FROM THE URINE BAG AND ON TO HIS SHOES AND ON THE FLOOR. ALL FAULTY PRODUCTS HAVE BEEN DISCARDED. THE HOLE WAS LOCATED IN THE SAME PLACE ON ALL DEFECTED CATHETERS. THE PATIENT'S WISH WAS TO CONTINUE USING LOFRIC HYDRO-KIT AND REQUESTED AN EXTRA BOX TO BE ADDED TO HIS YEARLY SUPPLY, EXPECTED LATER IN AUGUST, TO COMPENSATE FOR THE ONES THAT LEAKED. LOFRIC HYDRO-KIT IS A STERILE, SINGLE USE, HYDROPHILIC CATHETER WITH SALT SOLUTION FOR ACTIVATION, INTENDED FOR INTERMITTENT URINARY CATHETERIZATION. IT HAS AN INTEGRATED URINE COLLECTION BAG (PRIMARY PACKAGE) AND IS READY TO USE ANYWHERE. THE WETTING SOLUTION IS USED TO ACTIVATE THE HYDROPHILIC CATHETER COATING BEFORE USE. THE PATIENT DID NOT REPORT ANY HEALTH IMPACT OR MEDICAL COMPLICATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22910885 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 6, 2025Break; Leak/Splash; Delivered as Unsterile Product; Break; Leak/Splash; Delivered as Unsterile Product

    ADVERSE EVENT OCCURRED OUTSIDE US, IN GERMANY. A MALE PATIENT HAS BEEN USING URINARY CATHETERS, LOFRIC HYDRO-KIT NELATON (40CM, CH12) FOR SEVERAL YEARS. LOFRIC HYDRO-KIT IS A STERILE, SINGLE USE, HYDROPHILIC CATHETER WITH SALT SOLUTION FOR ACTIVATION, INTENDED FOR INTERMITTENT URINARY CATHETERIZATION. IT HAS AN INTEGRATED URINE COLLECTION BAG (PRIMARY PACKAGE) AND IS READY TO USE ANYWHERE. THE WETTING SOLUTION IS USED TO ACTIVATE THE HYDROPHILIC CATHETER COATING BEFORE USE. ON (B)(6), 2025, THE PATIENT CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE AND REPORTED THAT THERE WERE HOLES IN THE URINE COLLECTION BAGS FOR 4 OF THE PRODUCTS HE HAD USED. THE DEFECT IN URINE COLLECTION BAGS WAS DISCOVERED DURING USE AND THE URINE LEAKED OUT INSTEAD OF REMAINING IN THE URINE COLLECTION BAG. THE HOLE WAS LOCATED IN THE SAME PLACE ON ALL FOUR CATHETERS. NO INJURIES OR MEDICAL COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED FOR THE PATIENT. HE WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE USING LOFRIC HYDRO-KIT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22726421 ↗
  • InjuryMar 25, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE ADVERSE EVENT OCCURRED OUTSIDE US, IN (B)(6). A MALE PATIENT HAS BEEN USING, STERILE, SINGLE-USE INTERMITTENT URINARY CATHETERS, LOFRIC HYDRO-KIT NELATON (40CM, CH12). ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE AND REPORTED THAT HE GETS PAIN AND BURNING ON THE PENIS IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF THE CATHETERS. THE PATIENT SUSPECTED AN ALLERGIC REACTION. THE PATIENT DID SEEK MEDICAL CARE ON (B)(6), AND TESTS MADE ON THE PATIENT REVEALED HE HAS ALLERGY TO SORBITAN SESQUIOLATE, SORBITAN OLEATE, LINALOOL AND SODIUM METABISULFITES. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH AN INJECTION OF SPHINCTER TOXIN FOR RELAXING THE SPHINCTER. IN ADDITION TO THIS THE PATIENT ALSO HAS GOT A KNOWN ALLERGY TO PLASTIC OF TRANSPARENT DRESSINGS. THE PATIENT ALSO REPORTED THAT HE IS AFFECTED BY PAIN AND BURNING AFTER EACH CATHETERIZATION WITH ALL URINARY CATHETERS FROM ALL BRANDS. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT HE CHOOSES CATHETERS FROM WELLSPECT HEALTHCARE BECAUSE HE IS LEAST AFFECTED BY THOSE CATHETERS. THE PATIENT HAS BEEN USING CATHETERS FOR 6 MONTHS TO 1 YEAR.

    Patient problems: Local Reaction

    MAUDE report 21686064 ↗

Other Catheter, straight devices

All Catheter, straight devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page