T2 1846-1144SRecalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07613153316725), received between Jul 23, 2018 and Jul 23, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryJul 23, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE MANUFACTURER BECAME AWARE OF A POST MARKET CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP (PMCF) FROM (B)(6) UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (B)(6). THE TITLE OF THIS REPORT IS ¿ANALYSIS OF THE T2 RECON NAIL USED WITH THE ANTEGRADE LOCKING MODE¿ WHICH WAS RELEASED IN JUNE 2018 AND IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE T2 RECON NAILING SYSTEM. WITHIN THAT REPORT, POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS/ ADVERSE EVENTS WERE REPORTED, WHICH OCCURRED BETWEEN JANUARY 2014 AND NOVEMBER 2017. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE DEVICE AND PATIENT INFORMATION AND A REVIEW OF COMPLAINT HANDLING DATABASE IT WAS REVEALED THAT THE EVENTS HAVE NOT BEEN REPORTED BY THE HOSPITAL OR BY THE AUTHOR OF THE REPORT, THEREFORE 15 COMPLAINTS WERE INITIATED RETROSPECTIVELY FOR DIFFERENT ADVERSE EVENTS MENTIONED IN THE JOURNAL. THIS PRODUCT INQUIRY ADDRESSES HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION. 1 (CASE (B)(4)) OUT OF 1 CASES. THE PMCFR STATES: ¿IN ONE CASE (CASE (B)(4) AN HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION WAS OBSERVED. NO FURTHER PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED.¿

  Patient problems: Extraskeletal ossification

  MAUDE report 7711355 ↗